0
31

[–] buncha_cunts 0 points 31 points (+31|-0) ago  (edited ago)

People are so afraid of damaging their kids that they actually damage them through omission, rather than commission. People don't get it. The moment you give up your authority as a parent and start asking for fucking permission, is the moment you LOSE the inevitable struggle for dominance and testing of boundaries that children engage in.

1
10

[–] Nadesh 1 points 10 points (+11|-1) ago 

The truth is children start off small for a reason. They need to look up to the parents for love, guidance, correction, comfort and leadership. There is just no other way around this, only those who question the natural order of things fail to see this.

Just one look at her tells us she is lost to start with and it’s best if she remains quiet about the natural order of things.

0
6

[–] buncha_cunts 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

The truth is children start off small for a reason.

I figured that was mostly because you can't fit another fully grown human inside yourself, but I think you still have a valid point.

0
5

[–] InyourfaceNancyGrace 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Grossly unnatural hair color is one of the shortest paths to my mute button for your opinions. Just make my fucking coffee.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] buncha_cunts 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Part of the issue with the controversy of corporeal punishment, is people are unable to distinguish the different between a flick on the hand or slap on the behind, and literally beating your kids like you're defending yourself from a violent attacker. Negative reinforcement, done correctly, does work, and does not have to cause trauma. It's just that we've been manipulated by leftists into accepting that any form of corporeal punishment is abuse. Clinical psychologists are starting to say otherwise, in this generation of entitled brats who don't fear punishment. The authors of the bible knew long ago...spare the rod, spoil the child.

Hell, spanking didn't even work with my kid. She'd just laugh and say do it again. They don't learn from punishment if there is no pain. Change requires some degree of mental or physical pain. I personally would prefer the short-lasting physical pain over life-long emotional pain.

10
-6

0
23

[–] killkillkill 0 points 23 points (+23|-0) ago 

Any woman with brightly colored dyed hair is not worth listening to. In fact, she's probably insane.

0
7

[–] Grunge 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

This, it's a warning sign to stay away like them frogs with bright colors.

2
0

[–] Simonsaysgoat 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

Hey my fiance is a cosmotologist and has blue and green hair.

0
11

[–] Oh_Well_ian 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

have a great strap-on honeymoon !

throws rice<

0
3

[–] killkillkill 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

probably psychotic

1
13

[–] iforgottheotherone 1 points 13 points (+14|-1) ago 

next on the agenda: sex with kids is ok

0
8

[–] FuckJamesWoods 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I think this is a trap. Here's why:

Sensible people will say "don't be ridiculous, you don't need to ask the baby for permission to change its diaper".

So they will pass a law saying that the child doesn't need to CONSENT in order for an adult to remove their diaper (in other words, to see their genitals).

After that, The paedophiles are going to use this as a defense, successfully.

With every step, we get a bit closer to the bottom, hopefully.

0
12

[–] Fatpass121 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

Or on the other hand. This guy will ask the baby for permission to remove the diaper for changing. The baby makes a motion that he identifies as approval.

Next he asks the baby if it wants sex. And waits for the same motion.

He is trying to say a baby can give consent.

0
4

[–] SyriansAreTerrorists 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

The jews are already pushing it. They've made commercials about how "true love knows no age".

0
1

[–] Nadesh 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Burn it down now... this ain’t good at all...

0
0

[–] weezkitty 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

That's what I thought. This is introducing the ludicrous concept that babies can consent. Sexual consent with children is a "logical" step from here

0
11

[–] lissencarak 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

this implies babies can consent

this is why faggots belong in institutions

0
1

[–] HighEnergyLife 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Exactly. This is a step to pedophilia

1
10

[–] CheeseboogersGhost 1 points 10 points (+11|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Baby?? Can I change your diaper? Answer me!!! What is all of this ga ga goo goo shit?? Is it some kind of Nazi code language?? You racist jew hater!!!

0
10

[–] Fambida 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

"Sex expert"

Shouldn't a qualification for being called a sex expert include having ever had sex, and the ability to have it again?

0
3

[–] kammmmak 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

And is a mother

0
6

[–] GaydolphNiggler 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Did this really happen?

9
-9

0
5

[–] kalgon 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

It says sex expert, not parenthood expert

Her field of expertise is dildos and dykes, with probably few notions of trannies and gay bars

0
0

[–] UlyssesEMcGill 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

That's a dude, right?

load more comments ▼ (17 remaining)