You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
10

[–] Crensch [S] 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Who is "Judea"? As in the ROMAN province of Judea? So, ancient Rome declared war on Hitler?

I can't imagine making this argument and still expecting to be taken seriously.

This thing was fake news before fake news existed.

http://archive.is/bn2uX#selection-245.0-255.1 Even the stupid kikes show it happening.

Name ONE PERSON in this article that said was quoted. Just a single named person. Just one.

The above archive's text is sourced from the AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY.

Don't worry, I'll wait.

I'll be here when you get done with that crow.

6
-6

[–] cyclops1771 6 points -6 points (+0|-6) ago 

Who is "Judea"? As in the ROMAN province of Judea?

Please tell me what "Judea" is. You can try and deflect and misdirect and ignore all you want. Tell me what "Judea" is.

Name ONE PERSON in this article

Couldn't do it? Is it because there isn't a SINGLE name in the entire article?

This thing was fake news before fake news existed.

Holy shit. You did NOT just post a Wikileaks entry to refute "fake news." No fucking way that just happened. I'm figuratively speechless.

AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY

So, everything Jews say is TRUE? You REALLY want to put that angle forward? Is that really what you want to be your declaration?

Your stupid article you posted said "Judea", not the American Jewish Congress, along with Jewish War Veteran's and B'Nai B'rith combined with Sam Untermayer's Non-Secular Anti-Nazi League. You refuse to define Judea, whatever the fuck that is. The ONLY historical use of that is the Roman province. If that's what you mean, then it was a province in English run Palestine, just below the Samaria province. If THAT is what you mean, then why did Palestine negotiate and sign the Transfer Agreement in order to ENCOURAGE more interaction with Germany? Please explain this.

I'll be here when you get done with that crow.

Wikipedia? Really? Wikipedia?

0
4

[–] Crensch [S] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Wikipedia? Really? Wikipedia?

You really don't understand when it's OK to use the opposition's censored/tailored information in order to show inconsistencies?

Or maybe you're just too stupid to realize that if kikebook admits the event happened, then you really have no leg to stand on saying it didn't. You're arguing with a tabloid about whether or not the event happened, and the kikes admit it.

What part of that is difficult for you to understand?