0
82

[–] Whitworth 0 points 82 points (+82|-0) ago 

Feminism 2008: Public breastfeeding is good because breastmilk is natural and the evil patriarchy is trying to sexualize breasts!

Feminism 2018: Breasts are sexually exclusive and breastfeeding is bad because the evil patriarchy is trying to enforce gender roles!

It’s almost like feminism is completely unprincipled and fueled only by an insatiable inferiority complex.

0
37

[–] Kleemin 0 points 37 points (+37|-0) ago 

it has a term, penis envy

0
13

[–] knightwarrior41 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

it has a term, penis envy

yup

1
0

[–] Banned4Truth 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

yup

4
-2

[–] dadude90 4 points -2 points (+2|-4) ago  (edited ago)

There is no way anybody every looked at a penis and thought, man I wish I had that sticking to my inner thigh on a hot day. No one has ever thought 'man I wish I my gentiles were waggling about in that way'. I don't think I have ever met a single person who thought 'shit, I really need just that thing which sometimes uncontrollably grows and embarrasses me. But thats not all, I also want two little ball type things there too which when hit with any amount of force makes me immobile for minutes'.

Penis envy has to be the silliest concept ever which men tell themselves exist because they think women look at men the same way men look at women. At most I'd say women are jealous that men don't have periods but I think close to noone has ever said 'man I really wish I had just a fucking penis right there hanging between my legs, waggling about'. And the VERY VERY few that do are by no means some sort of group large enough to cite to claim that 'penis envy' is running rampant within society. Putting those people as the forefront of modern liberalism is the same as putting George Noory listeners at the forefront of everyone who leans politically right.

0
14

[–] VoatMobile 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

It's because when society accepts or tolerates something by SJWs, the game is over.

To continue to exist, they have to contrive another problem to act oppressed about.

I can't imagine where it could go from here.

0
3

[–] SurfinMindWaves 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

The stupidity seems to ramp up by the day now. Forced androgyny next?

0
0

[–] Schreiber 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

This is why we had mob rules and lynching.

When you see someone falls into SJWtard bullshit, you lynch them as conspirators. Say, a nigger was caught murdering a whitey and sentenced to lynching, the white soiboi who's like noooo don't lynch him he deserve rights, would be lynched by the angry mobs as well.

0
0

[–] HillBoulder 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Animal udders are next. Then cockroach clits. Then spirit beings and aliens. Hopefully that's the end of it.

0
0

[–] HaloIsLife 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

You nailed it.

0
6

[–] Uncle_Tractor 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

It's actually quite simple; feminism is about shitting on men. Keep that in mind, and everything a feminist says and does will make perfect sense.

0
3

[–] TheAntiZealot 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

unprincipled

You could be a genius. You might be a prophet. May I touch the hem of your garment? Just to be near you is enough!

0
6

[–] BlueDrache 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Username does not check out.

1
22

[–] CowWithBeef 1 points 22 points (+23|-1) ago 

You're watching feminism die.

0
10

[–] zak_the_mac 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

It's true. It's making itself more extreme over time, waking up more people who read articles like these, and suddenly realise how insane it's all become.

0
5

[–] CallASpadeASpade 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

How so? The country is in decline but feminism is thriving. The correlation is clear, though.

0
1

[–] knightwarrior41 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

How so? The country is in decline but feminism is thriving. The correlation is clear, though.

agreed

1
0

[–] malloryquinn 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Why not help it?

We live in the era of the female penis. Why not push women out of feminisim by excluding them as they were just born that way, they didn't earn the right to be a woman?

Look at sports, men are clearly better women than women. And they can't say a god damned thing

3
22

[–] Mumbleberry 3 points 22 points (+25|-3) ago 

Some extra-bizarro SJW bullshit.

0
8

[–] 1HepCat 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

The mental gymnastics are off the charts. I'm surprised the author was able to almost form coherent sentences with that much cognitive load.

0
12

[–] jxfaith 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

I love how they call this kind of shit a study. Slap a label on it and take a couple of surveys and it magically transforms an opinionated essay into science.

0
16

[–] AOU 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago 

Degeneracy.

0
12

[–] webrustler 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

Wikipedia, of all places.

Pages in category "Melchior family" Arne Melchior

Bent Melchior

Marcus Melchior

Michael Melchior

Categories: Danish families ((((Jewish))) families

1
9

[–] undertheshills 1 points 9 points (+10|-1) ago 

(((every))) (((fucking))) (((time)))

1
2

[–] Inconceivable2 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

What. You thought (((they))) would take a day off sometime? That's not according to (((plan)))

0
4

[–] CaliforniaOrange 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Can we get a bot that scans article authors and reports if it’s a Jewish last name or not?

That shit would be awesome.

1
1

[–] ProgNaziGator 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Lol like a plugin that adds a star next to their name. Shit that would get them pissed.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] BlowjaySimpson 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Get the Coincidence Detector.

0
0

[–] Schreiber 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Would that actually have an effect?

I mean take this as an example.

See that? Weinberg✡

Yet voaters are racing each other to give DDG traffics, even in Voat there's always those DDG worship circlejerks popping in once in a while along with that 100% kosher gabai honeypots being treated as the savior of humankind.

0
1

[–] VoatMobile 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I realize how Kafka came up with his ideas.

He simply knew the absurdity of his people.

0
10

[–] 12594858? 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Subversion.

0
9

[–] FuggBenis 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

All I feel is rage.

0
0

[–] RageAgainstTheAmish 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Typical jewish trick:

Blind the goyim with rage so it doesnt know what to do

0
8

[–] Prudencia_Prim 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

0
0

[–] NeoGoat 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Yup. Title: "Unintended Consequences of Invoking the “Natural” in Breastfeeding Promotion"

referenced sentence "Referencing the “natural” in breastfeeding promotion, then, may inadvertently endorse a controversial set of values about family life and gender roles, which would be ethically inappropriate."

There is much whining about using "natural" because it implies vaccines & other aspects of traditional medicine are bad.

0
1

[–] feral-toes 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

From the link

Promoting breastfeeding as “natural” may be ethically problematic, and, even more troublingly, it may bolster this belief that “natural” approaches are presumptively healthier. This may ultimately challenge public health’s aims in other contexts, particularly childhood vaccination.

The interesting thing about vaccination is that the adaptive immune system does the heavy lifting. The doctor/medical side of things is just a bit of trickery. We get the immune system to respond as if it has seen the infection before, and it does the clever stuff of remembering the "bad molecules" and getting the white blood cells to go in for the kill. That is the same stuff that happens if you acquire your immunity from surviving the actual disease. So vaccination is 90% natural.

How do we know that vaccination is safe in the long term? We haven't run 70 year long randomised controlled trials to discover all-cause mortality, so there is a perspective from which we can doubt the safety of vaccines. Our confidence that vaccines are actually safe long term comes from the presumption that "natural" approaches are healthier plus an understanding of how vaccination works that shows that it is 90% natural. After all, if there are problems, we should also be seeing them in cases of natural immunity from surviving the actual disease.

Vaccination is a big success because it is humble medicine. The doctor plays a little trick and nature does all the hard work. Its bad that the American Academy of Pediatrics is indulging in a Star Trek fantasy. The presumption that natural approaches are healthy can be rebutted. Perhaps in the twenty-third century complete rebuttals are routine and Doctor McCoy uses the replicator to produce baby food better than breast milk. But in 2018 we are better off sticking to approaches, such as vaccination, that are mostly natural. And we need the American Academy of Pediatrics to purge its idiots.

load more comments ▼ (62 remaining)