0
18

[–] CrustyBeaver52 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago 

Best doggo ever:)

11
2

[–] WhiteSurvivalist 11 points 2 points (+13|-11) ago 

He's a commie who taught his commie dog a stupid trick to piss off his commie girlfriend.

0
22

[–] freedumbz 0 points 22 points (+22|-0) ago 

He might be a massive communist faggot, but if this case wins it will be used to shit all over every communist faggot in UK. I think in light of that it's worth it to share a few shekels.

2
11

[–] lorlipone [S] 2 points 11 points (+13|-2) ago 

He's addressed this multiple times - he USED to be a commie, but now he looks back on it with shame.

0
4

[–] Reverse-Flash 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

commie. free money. sounds right.

0
2

[–] theoldones 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

not anymore, since the left decided he was exiled, i would imagine.

0
8

[–] Costington_Livrwurth 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

This is fucking incredible. This has essentially snatched a freedom destroying victory right from their grubby little fingers. I wouldn't even care if he spent most of it on beers. Heil victory.

0
3

[–] Rainy-Day-Dream 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

there's no free speech in that joke nation i only donated to the faggot so he can prove it again, maybe he'll actually go to jail this time like a proper political martyr

0
1

[–] lorlipone [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Watched a recent video of his where he basically said he was TRYING to get thrown in jail as a sort of protest statement. He had his lawyer tell the judge before the sentencing that he would not comply with any fine or community service they imposed. I think he's really embracing the whole political martyr thing.

0
0

[–] Rainy-Day-Dream 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

looking at him i'd say he's probably just looking forward to the raping tbh, but either way it's more useful optics if he is in jail

0
3

[–] ninjajunkie 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Short of the ear plugs, he looks quite similar to how I'd always pictured a crusader. Godspeed, Count.

0
2

[–] Vic_V 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

pretty sure britain could seize all of it because he's a terrorist according to some bureaucrat

0
1

[–] 12586365? 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Lawyers are over paid fuckwits.

4
0

[–] Shekelstein6M 4 points 0 points (+4|-4) ago 

Unemployed communist that is on record admitting he doesn't care about white genocide gets 100 000 pounds for making a joke to piss off his sjw girlfriend and you people think this is some kind of a victory.

3
1

[–] middle_path 3 points 1 points (+4|-3) ago 

It sets a good president.

0
2

[–] TheAntiZealot 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I upvoated you.

But I am guessing two people downvoated you for precedent.

president

1
0

[–] 1HepCat 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

I'm not sure this is a victory. On the one hand, it's great that the internet banded together to protect an individual's right to free speech. On the other hand, I'm afraid that the lesson that the UK government will learn is that if you're running low on revenue, just fine a few citizens for something they said and the rest of the world will cough up more than enough money to cover their otherwise unnecessary expenses. I.e., unless we can figure out some way for the UK government to lose >= £800 for their actions, their behavior was rewarded and now there's less motivation for British citizens to call for redress.

0
3

[–] lorlipone [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

So far they've paid tens of thousands of dollars in court administration fees to try him.

Also, he's stated pretty unequivocally that he's not going to pay them. That's what this gofundme is for - to hire some power house civil rights attorneys to help him win the appeal so that this precedent doesn't stick.

0
1

[–] fr33europe 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

They haven’t paid shit, it’s not like the government has money to spend

0
2

[–] RoBatten 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

But it's not "their" money they would be losing. It's our money, tax money, and they could not give one single fuck. If they need more, they will just raise the taxes . . .

0
1

[–] TheAntiZealot 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

The government isn't a proper business. They don't necessarily run on money. They run on approval (and I don't mean just a voting system).

Governments must maintain the social appearance of legitimacy. This incentivizes them to subsidize corporations and socialist programs alike.

If you want to hurt the government financially, it probably makes more sense to target individual contributors to corruption (politicians, et cetera).

0
1

[–] 1HepCat 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Good points. Governments do have budgets, though. This is why they levy taxes and e.g., issue speeding tickets--bureaucrats have mouths to feed and have ambitions for more underlings, etc. too.

The other point (in other replies) that the GoFundMe is actually a legal defense fund and not just recompense is very helpful/informative too. Thanks to the voat peeps for the infos.

load more comments ▼ (1 remaining)