3
10

[–] Gowdy [S] 3 points 10 points (+13|-3) ago  (edited ago)

Well this was downvoated in under 30 seconds. I'm jack's complete lack of surprise.

edit: then the new users flooded this thread... some would delete and others would chat.

0
1

[–] IGiveZeroFucks 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

What is the appropriate response to this nightmare bill?

0
2

[–] Gowdy [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Outrage is fine. I'm just not going to assume every new outraged person is a genuine member of the community.

0
0

[–] worthlesshope 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

your username is

1
3

[–] YouveSeenTheButcher 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

This shit all over Voat, Stefan Molyneux losing his mind questioning what it is "about white people and why they're so narcissistic..." (Yes. According to Stefan, white people are not only narcissistic but are also to blame for Trump signing the bill) in regard to Trump signing this bill.
No one is willing to do what it takes let alone expose those who are responsible.

It doesn't fucking matter what you do or don't do. If you don't, are unwilling, or are too afraid to openly name and expose your enemies, how do you expect to win? You become susceptible to deceit, subversion and manipulation. Instead of fighting against the shadows on the walls, you need to turn around and face the figure that is casting the shadow.

A dual citizen is either loyal to one nation or the other. They cannot be loyal to both.

Expose the Jews who are responsible and you're half-way there.

Jews would rather you oppose Trump than for you to oppose them.

When it comes to your Country, your Nation, your Folk, you're loyalty should be unto the Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights not to a party or an individual.

1
2

[–] MaunaLoona 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

Are we supposed to be cheerleaders for Trump regardless of what he does? If you think that Trump's approval of the ginormous omnibus spending bill is a good thing, I'm all ears.

2
2

[–] Gowdy [S] 2 points 2 points (+4|-2) ago  (edited ago)

Nope. Not at all. I'm just saying we should recognize obvious social media manipulation. Pretty sure my Rand Paul post criticizing these actions is still the top on voat atm. Should we not be skeptical of a flood of hardly active and new users that have chosen this moment to get political? CTR, ShareBlue... these are confirmed social media operations.

https://voat.co/v/politics/2462455

0
0

[–] Koalemos_Grottesco 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

If we already feel outrage than how is that manipulation?

0
0

[–] worthlesshope 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

You're wording things better than me. This outrage culture is absurd that's why it looks and feels like the President's opposition is the one controlling all these threads.

1
-1

[–] Butterbread 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

The answer is no, however I think people are not putting his signing--not vetoing--in perspective.

That is, this bill is business as usual in DC. Trump, as good or bad as anyone thinks he is, is not able to fight business as usual in DC. Do you understand me?

Put another way...ah, forget it. Let's wait and see. What did the President say today?

0
1

[–] MaunaLoona 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

My biggest disappointment is the increase in military budget. It's completely unnecessary. The military has enough money to do what they need to do. If they need more money they should pull out of Afganistan and dozens of other countries where they have no business of being in.

5
1

[–] voatHatesTheFirst 5 points 1 points (+6|-5) ago 

No one ever did or said anything until you saw them do it on voat.

You are an idiot, crensch.

1
2

[–] Gowdy [S] 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

Why don't you use @sanegoatiswear anymore?

6
-1

[–] voatHatesTheFirst 6 points -1 points (+5|-6) ago 

Everyone is freshmeat, right crensh.

You are an idiot.

2
1

[–] I_Would_Gas_You 2 points 1 points (+3|-2) ago 

He should have vetoed. Did anyone connect that his sons wife of 9 years with 5 kids is divorcing him right before this? I found that odd.

2
3

[–] Gowdy [S] 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago 

No one is happy with it, but it's amazing the new and barely used accounts that chose to comment on this. Including you 4 months 261scp 264ccp

4
-1

[–] I_Would_Gas_You 4 points -1 points (+3|-4) ago 

You found me out man. I made this account to forum slide and subvert. My jewish ways are diacovered. How will I afford to feed my children now that my slave wages from share blue are taken away at this discovery. There is being vigilant and then crazy paranoid. But you do you man. I don't think you are wrong in this cap. Just overzealous.

0
1

[–] YouveSeenTheButcher 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Why would that be odd?
Could it be she's divorcing him because he is now hated by many violent and deranged individuals and groups who would cherish the day he (or anyone of his family members) died?

Could it be because she went from a cozy rich life, no doubt feeling fully secure, to all the sudden fearing for the lives of her children, husband and herself on a daily basis?

Could it be because her brother in law received a letter that contained an unknown powdery substance?

Could it be because her husband is all tied up in a false investigation dealing with "Russian ties" and it's beginning to take a toll on him and his family?

Maybe he fucked someone else.

Why would this bill pique any sort of suspicion as to why they're divorcing? You make no sense what-so-ever.

We're goats here, not sheep. You wore the wrong disguise.

0
0

[–] I_Would_Gas_You 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

You guys sure got me.

1
0

[–] CheeseboogersGhost 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

People have a right to be concerned. Do you even understand what he did today??

2
0

[–] Gowdy [S] 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

Better than you I'd wager.

0
0

[–] CheeseboogersGhost 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

No you don't or you wouldn't defend this backstabbing piece of shit. Youre either a dumb sheep or youre a shill. Neither is acceptable.

0
0

[–] Mind_Games 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Just change the construct. You don't get the ability to upvote until you hit 1000 as well. This prevents the circle jerkers from upvoting one another to gain access to downvoting.

0
0

[–] Gowdy [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

1,000?

0
0

[–] Mind_Games 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

It's 100 right now. It should be bumped up to 1000 (imo) which is why I say that.

0
0

[–] Tubesbestnoob 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Maybe he normally does so on Reddit.

load more comments ▼ (7 remaining)