2
3

[–] voltronsdicks 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago 

0
1

[–] GassyMcGasface 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

You win thread closed.

0
1

[–] voltronsdicks 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

0
2

[–] gazillions 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The only way some women can succeed in public office is if they see themselves in a supportive role. As in supporting what the population wants. They get it all wrong, but natural to their biology, when they view the voters as little children that need to be instructed and guided by them. They get it wrong too many times.

0
2

[–] MrHighBrow 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

No mention of Carly Fiorina? I feel like she was eligible for this list as both a horrible leader and an even worse presidential candidate.

0
1

[–] BentAxel 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Queen Isabella of Spain?

0
0

[–] TeranNotTerran 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Typical Return of Kings. Not a fan of it at all. They are way off in the deep end, truly sexist and not just looking at women objectively.

I do appreciate their role in helping steer people to the middle, but it really is a bit much for me.

0
0

[–] R34p_Th3_Wh0r1w1nd 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

DWS is not on the list and should be.

0
0

[–] Empire_of_the_mind 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Fuckin brill headline

2
-1

[–] SolarBaby 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

I don't know why women in the USA act like women have never been leaders before just because the USA has not had a president. They say that a woman president would be the answer to everything. The world is full of women in powerful positions, even top positions in different countries and in major corporations. History is also replete with women leaders. What it has all shown is that women are as corruptible, ruthless and terrible as any man.

I also don't understand how anyone could be so deluded as to believe that someone's gender or race is an important attribute in determining their leadership potential or that it should even be considered when choosing a leader.

0
0

[–] TeranNotTerran 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I agree with your first paragraph for the most part.

There is a huge skew in race with average IQ. I don't know of many good leaders who were dumb. Women also tend to have different strengths and weaknesses than men. They can overlap a lot and I've seen women who were more manly than most men I know, along with men who were more womanly than most women I know.

My friend is having to take hormone pills and it's amazing to see her change and be so much more emotional. Just the addition of hormones makes a huge difference. Now some women will have very different hormone and brain profiles than other women.

But, my Dad always said his best boss was a woman and I trust his word for it. He's had a lot of bosses. Female bosses can be a lot more emphathetic and tend to see smaller personal details a lot better.

I'm sure there could be a good female president but biologically speaking a man is more likely to be better suited for the role. Of course with that, the evils of men are different than the evils of women. A lot of it is trading one type of bad for a different type of bad.

0
0

[–] TrumpTheGodEmperor 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I also don't understand how anyone could be so deluded as to believe that someone's gender or race is an important attribute in determining their leadership potential or that it should even be considered when choosing a leader.

Yeah because fuck millions of years of evolution of exactly this trait in men, let's completely ignore that and pretend humanity started only 100 years ago.