You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
3

[–] eongoat 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

First of all the new law is not signed by the governor yet, He's not a bright bulb so I don't have hopes it will be vetoed as I think it should be.

basically it is this:

  1. raise buy limit for rifles to 21
  2. 3 day wait period (handguns already have this)
  3. a voluntary armed guardian program for schools, It allows school personnel to be armed, subject to school district approval and specialist training
  4. bump stock ban
  5. mental health funding and increases the power to seize or ban guns under mental health concerns

the Governor doesn't like the "arming teacher's" part, so maybe it gets vetoed. Like I said, not a bright bulb. Currently states it's being reviewed line by line.

If I had money/lawyers, I would immediately challenge it as unconstitutional due to the 18-21 ban part if it passes. Old enough to die for the country, old enough to own a rifle.

Mostly it's just another "ban" law that criminals will ignore

edit: Here it is

0
0

[–] slickleg64 ago 

If a teacher wanted to shoot up a school. he would of already. training and arming teachers will only reduce deaths

0
0

[–] totes_magotes [S] ago 

No one said it was passed yet. Title says "passing" which means it's in the process and heading towards the governor.

As per point 3, the local sheriff's department also needs to be willing to be a part of that program.

All said, however, none of that changes the fact that it's a red pill against "gun free zones."