0
13

[–] KikeFree 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

Everyone thinks this can never happen in their society/country.

0
3

[–] Talc 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

it didn't happen that way in Cambodia either.

0
1

[–] redditaccountlogin 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Nice one man. You ruined the circlejerk, now what are we supposed to do?

1
1

[–] Maxcactus 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

When people here on Voat talk about day of the rope I think they are dreaming of this.

3
0

[–] fuckingmockies 3 points 0 points (+3|-3) ago 

I am. I'd love to round up and execute Marxists and nonwhites.

0
5

[–] DieselBustersYes 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Sad :(

1
4

[–] Talc 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Totally false information, another of those easily debunked fairy stories spread by the anti-gun false flag group jews for the preservation of firearms ownership.

Cambodia did not clamp down on guns. During this period there were more guns in private ownership in Cambodia than in the Military. It is more than possible for a dictator to brutalise the majority of a country whilst leaving a large minority holding guns, especially in a nation already divided by strife where half the population could not afford to buy a gun.

What Cambodia did was to throw out some individual gun dealers who were dumping defective dangerous guns prohibited from sale elsewhere onto the Cambodian market, an action which no right-minded person could argue with. I'm guessing this last bit but as the wrath of the Jews seems to have been invoked I can only guess that the evicted gun dealers were Jewish.

edit to add, same bullshit is spread about how Hitler grabbed the guns (while he was still an army corporal), about how Guatemala grabbed the guns (CIA armed primitive tribes with M1 carbine and tried to set them on the government, they carried on fighting each other, thousands died), about how Uganda grabbed the guns (they de-funded their gun laws so you could only be arrested for a gun if you broke another law at the same time), about how China grabbed the guns (but their quoted law is named like a USA law, that's not how China names its laws).

[–] [deleted] 2 points 2 points (+4|-2) ago 

[Deleted]

1
0

[–] Sublimesati 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

The U.S. military won't turn on it's citizens. You defeat your own argument. The military is comprised of citizens. The military will defy any order of aggression against American citizens. Ron Paul got the most military donations for a reason and he was pretty much an micro government isolationist. The military will take orders up to a point, same goes for law enforcement. If a million people marched on Washington D.C. demanding change you won't see the military protecting the elite. Maybe blackwater or other mercenary type groups.

0
0

[–] Diggernicks 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

There's no saying the government can't hire private mercs to turn on us. Cease being a brainwashed sheeple.

0
1

[–] Asvnoyi 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

'The Killing Fields' was a non-fiction book authored by Sam Waterson. In 1984 there was a movie with the same title made from the book.

Here's what Wikipedia has to say about the Kmer Rouge The Killing Fields

0
1

[–] jewd_law 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Imagine if those same murders had access to the arsenal of weapons that are currently at the disposal of ZOG? chilling and disconcerting.

0
0

[–] Artofchoke 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Pol pot wanted to change the past. He wanted to change reality. He's a person from history I'd very much like to speak with.

0
0

[–] freshmeat 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

How were they killed? That's a lot of pristine skulls

load more comments ▼ (2 remaining)