You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
7

[–] BLOODandHONOUR 1 points 7 points (+8|-1) ago 

Well what do you personally think the affects on a baby might be when it is genitally mutilated within hours or a few days of birth and with no anesthesia?

3
15

[–] fuckingmockies 3 points 15 points (+18|-3) ago 

Cognitive dissonance. Dude is probably circumcised and finds it easier to defend circumcision than it is for him to face the reality that some fucking mocky mutilated his genitals.

1
8

[–] BLOODandHONOUR 1 points 8 points (+9|-1) ago 

Yes I have seen this quite a few times. Calling it MGM would then mean that you admit that someone mutilated you with your parents consent. It opens up a whole new world of problems that most would rather not deal with. It’s quite tough. Even restoring doesn’t give you the nerves back but it does protect the glans again and reduces greatly the likelyhood of Erectile Dysfunction which is highly prevalent in circumcised men. A testament to this is that Israel has the highest use of viagra/cialis.

1
2

[–] Alopix 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

I'm uncircumcised and don't support circumcision. Just pointing out the material is pretty weak.

2
2

[–] Alopix 2 points 2 points (+4|-2) ago 

I don't know, but I'd like them to get this evidence on paper and in the open so I can show it people when they try to say circumcision is harmless.