0
19

[–] FuckJamesWoods 0 points 19 points (+19|-0) ago 

The United Nations is likely the most corrupt entity on earth, if they say an individual is guilty of war crimes it's most likely not true.

0
5

[–] peacegnome 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

(((most corrupt))) you say?

0
9

[–] gazillions 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

The United Nations sided with al quaida then and have been supporting islamic jihad ever since. The United Nations and NATO bombed Christians with depleted uranium bombs in that war. The western media deliberately demonized the non muslims, just like they demonized the Buddhists of Myanmar. Because that war went on longer due to the UN & Nato killings, the media had to cover their dirt in convoluted, vague and confusing news reports. At the time, no one watching the news had a clue who was who or what was what. Ask any boomer and they'll shrug their shoulders to this day.

0
2

[–] FreeBreivik 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I know about the Jews, but why has the west been siding with Muslims for so long to the point of bombing a white country? Treating them like a precious commodity in the west while still attacking their homelands? Is it just Jews doing all this to fuck us while building greater Israel? Or is there something more going on?

I feel like there's still a missing factor.

0
1

[–] gazillions 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Everyone of the agencies involved has their own agenda. The UN could have made a gruesome mistake in Bosnia and just keep backing it up in order not admit they screwed up so badly, but I doubt it. Personally, I think they're disconnected, delusional poindexters that actually believe they have all the answers and understand all life on earth, and that forcing islam on the entire world is just a good idea. They've been personally subjected to endless lobbying, phony graphs and doctored statistics and had their egos fluffed up beyond comprehension by all the other interested parties for so long they've become psychotically disconnected. And probably bribed.

0
0

[–] Schreiber 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The wealthiest 1% creating staged political drama to make the powerless poor fight each other.

All of those rich UN officials didn't do shit to help anyone but themselves. All they do is sit in their comfy chairs enriching themselves.

Everyone is a victim. If you don't have millions of dollars savings then you are a victim.

0
7

[–] Le_Squish 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Thank you for elaborating. I hadn't realized the significance of the news.

0
3

[–] Dalai_Llama 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Awesome post. This guy is fucking bad ass.

0
5

[–] Caesarkid1 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Under current thinking leading someone to suicide is a crime. So the court is guilty for causing this mans death under their own thinking.

Edit: I agree it's all bullshit from start to finish.

0
2

[–] Shekelstein6M 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Praljak was charged with ordering the destruction of Mostar’s 16th-century bridge in November 1993, which judges in the first trial had said “caused disproportionate damage to the Muslim civilian population”.

This is now considered a war crime. Destroying a strategic target...

What right does the UN have to judge anyone. Who gave them the mandate? Who elected them? Who were his peers to judge him?

1
-1

[–] speedisavirus 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Lets just ignore he was in charge of the area and

The city experienced some of the worst of the Croat-Muslim clashes, with nearly 80% of its eastern area destroyed in the fighting.

He was convicted for indiscriminate and brutal killing of civilians. Not that bridge.

0
0

[–] giantthrobbingcock [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Do you have a link? The report stated he caused harm to the muslim population by destroying the bridge, even though the court had already acknowledged that it was a legitimate target.

0
1

[–] dooob 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I though they ruled that the destruction of the bridge was a strategic move, i think he was convinced for killing muslims altho i am not sure myself. If his case was run same as serbian's Seselj, narrative driven investigation, you lose no matter what.

The guy was badass, he served 2/3s of his prison time, he was eligible for early release yet he sacrificed himself to be heard.

0
0

[–] greenfascist 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

When at war, civilians are legitimate targets.

0
0

[–] lexsird 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

And they run slower.

0
0

[–] speedisavirus 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Yeah, not at all possible it was because he was also in charge of

The city experienced some of the worst of the Croat-Muslim clashes, with nearly 80% of its eastern area destroyed in the fighting.

load more comments ▼ (1 remaining)