You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

8
-6

[–] Crikes 8 points -6 points (+2|-8) ago 

This is inaccurate. Blacks had amazing advances for a century before the welfare state sabotage was implemented. In fact black families were stronger than white.

If they lived in a free market, the avg IQ among blacks would increase as the most successful would outnumber the losers, and the losers would dwindle.

It's not that blacks are incapable of doing better. There are blacks smarter than everyone you know. All that is necessary to turn blacks into the highest IQ average would be to incentivize only those with >106 IQs to proceate. Likewise, all that would be necessary to lower the Asian avg IQ to the lowesr would be to incentivize the losers among them to reproduce as much as possible, and offer disincentive for those with >80 IQ.

0
5

[–] wgtt911 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Explain Africa then....

0
2

[–] WarAtTheZoo [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Africa explains itself quite well. Sub saharan Africans never invented written language or the wheel. Blacks, in their natural habitat, live a very primitive life.

2
0

[–] Crikes 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago  (edited ago)

Many generations of simple living, much like Native Americans. They're late to the game, & were advancing well (in US). Then they were weaponized by providing for them, destroying their markets, & creating several generations that were worse off than before. Now they're being used to infect other cultures.

Again, this isn't due to blackness, but sabotage. It's imperative to understand this, especially for those who would endorse eliminating them.. because once that is done, you have to move to the next scapegoats if you're not going to address the cause, which is government meddling.

Edit: I shouldn't say "simple living", but living in conditions conducive to certain traits, such as increased melanin & heat tolerance.

It's all relative. Those relatively better suited should thrive, & those relatively disadvantaged should dwindle.

The industrial revolution, & then internet, changed everything. Technology enables us to live under ocean without needing to.be a dolphin, or in space. It could be that all if these traits we identify with will cease to be in a few dozen generations. The point is, it'll be all for better if we're free, & we'll be "humans lite", if not extinct, if this forced redistribution of wealth sabotage is continued.

3
-1

[–] opsonizer 3 points -1 points (+2|-3) ago 

Climate. Disease burden - hard to do anything when your brain is addled with sleeping sickness and you are peeing blood all the time. It's really a continent where you cannot live a normal life without modern medicine.

3
-1

[–] Crikes 3 points -1 points (+2|-3) ago 

Africa vs black Americans reinforces my point.

0
1

[–] MasivGam3 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

My guess it that the Left with their victim mentality propaganda and identity politics hurt blacks in USA as no one ever in history. The damage done to the Blacks by the (((Liberal))) ideology will be impossible to undo.

0
1

[–] RageAgainstTheAmish 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

amazing advances for a century

Peanut butter.

1
1

[–] solvire 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

This is partially truthful. Let me run with my counter argument for fun: There is a tendency for breeding to effect IQ (bell curve), but it would take considerable management and there are scarcely few societies that do this successfully. This isn't something that normally happens in their native environments. Or anything nearing the equator. If they moved to the tundra or any very cold climate, however, nature would take care of the culling on the daily. But then over time their skin would end up white because they wouldn't need the melanin. All races are victim of the access to easy food and shelter right now. Whites are getting really stupid in some parts of the US.

Well.... guess we are back on square one again.

I think the human population is about to experience a mass extinction event. Biological eco systems don't handle this type of growth forever.

2
0

[–] Crikes 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

The free market, which means lack of forced redistribution of wealth, makes for an ethical, survival of the fittest, eugenics. Forced redistribution of wealth is dysgenics.

It isn't blackness that is the problem, but the artificial incentives sabotaging them. After some number of generations of freedom, this would be a non-issue.