You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
-1

[–] MasivGam3 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

That is only your opinion and you have any right to have it.

every major historian

Because those who do not agree with the only "correct" version of history are haunted and their carrier and lives ruined. That's why there is such beautiful consensus about things often obviously wrong.

and most people

No doubt about that. As they will be told by CNN all they need to know.

And - burden of proof is with you regardless, as it was you who put forward the claim. You have a claim - you provide the proof. The speculation that "everybody knows it" and "don't you agree with the authorities?" are typical examples of logical fallacy - as you have no proof, you are indulging in demagogy. Not that it was hard to foresee.

0
0

[–] the_sovereign ago 

The book called for gassing Jews. The Nazi gassed the Jews. It clearly wasn't just a WW1 metaphor. Your argument failed. Simple enough?

0
0

[–] MasivGam3 ago  (edited ago)

Let us take apart your message:

The book called for gassing Jews.

The book did not call for "gassing the Jews" as in "all Jews must be killed by poison gas - men, women and children alike", which indeed would be a call for a genocide. It is simply not there.

The Nazi gassed the Jews.

What if they had gassed them even without this book? (Some will say they never actually did and that is technically impossible the way it is presented.) You are missing the point that you have to prove that the two facts form a cause-and-consequence chain instead of just being present.

It clearly wasn't just a WW1 metaphor.

It was not a call for genocide either.

Your argument failed.

Let us begin from the beginning - that you have not produced a proof for your claim as of yet, so if anything is failing, then it is you. Sorry if you are saddened by your assumptions and beliefs not being accepted as facts. Because ... they aren't.

Simple enough?

Pretty nonsensical, actually.