You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
The Tsarnaevs didn't do the bombing. Check out the Craft agents who had the same exact bag that exploded, which was different than the one that the younger brother had.
But this is really about that guy's assumptions and his audience's prejudices, not the truth. If we work off the official numbers, official declarations of what events are "terrorism" and who is or isn't muslim, then his revision of "killed" to "casualty" might be close to correct (within 100 casualties, on first glance).
However, I don't accept those official proclamations. And what's more, it doesn't matter what we accept, because his implied point is the same thing every Bill Maher, Al Franken, and Barry "Bitter Clingers" Soetero say every chance they get: that right-wing Christians are a greater threat to life than anyone, much less muslims. And they successfully use it to write unConstitutional law, prosecute the innocent, and more.
It isn't about "what was actually terrorism", it was "what the public believes was terrorism".
If we can point out the flaws in their numbers using their own false flags, great. If we can make them admit on their own that the false flags weren't actually terrorist plots, even better.
Either way, showing off the errors in their claims makes us win.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] eagleshigh 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
The Tsarnaevs didn't do the bombing. Check out the Craft agents who had the same exact bag that exploded, which was different than the one that the younger brother had.
God you goyim are so gullible.
[–] lemon11 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
But this is really about that guy's assumptions and his audience's prejudices, not the truth. If we work off the official numbers, official declarations of what events are "terrorism" and who is or isn't muslim, then his revision of "killed" to "casualty" might be close to correct (within 100 casualties, on first glance).
However, I don't accept those official proclamations. And what's more, it doesn't matter what we accept, because his implied point is the same thing every Bill Maher, Al Franken, and Barry "Bitter Clingers" Soetero say every chance they get: that right-wing Christians are a greater threat to life than anyone, much less muslims. And they successfully use it to write unConstitutional law, prosecute the innocent, and more.
[–] 10736940? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
It isn't about "what was actually terrorism", it was "what the public believes was terrorism".
If we can point out the flaws in their numbers using their own false flags, great. If we can make them admit on their own that the false flags weren't actually terrorist plots, even better.
Either way, showing off the errors in their claims makes us win.