You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
[+]weezkitty7 points-2 points5 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]weezkitty7 points
-2 points
5 points
(+5|-7)
ago
(edited ago)
Poor way to analyze data. (Exaggerated to illustrate the point) but theoretically we could have had 100 hurricanes from 2000 to 2017 and 19 from 1850 to 2000.
Sure you can compute the average of 119/(2017-1850) = .71 Hurricanes per year. But again that doesn't prove nor disprove anything because it does not consider any trends.
Woah sir, you go against the flow here on Voat, you'll be called a kike and downvoted. Climate change is like evolution in some ways, where the right winged, religious nuts denied evolution and ridiculed anyone for believing it. They brought up all these "proofs" and "facts" on how it was not real.
Now, most believe in it, though some still deny it.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] weezkitty 7 points -2 points 5 points (+5|-7) ago (edited ago)
Poor way to analyze data. (Exaggerated to illustrate the point) but theoretically we could have had 100 hurricanes from 2000 to 2017 and 19 from 1850 to 2000.
Sure you can compute the average of 119/(2017-1850) = .71 Hurricanes per year. But again that doesn't prove nor disprove anything because it does not consider any trends.
[–] Philosopher_King 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
Woah sir, you go against the flow here on Voat, you'll be called a kike and downvoted. Climate change is like evolution in some ways, where the right winged, religious nuts denied evolution and ridiculed anyone for believing it. They brought up all these "proofs" and "facts" on how it was not real.
Now, most believe in it, though some still deny it.
[–] [deleted] ago
[–] weezkitty ago
The most annoying part is that people don't realize that the source of the denial originated from the oil lobby