You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

7
-2

[–] weezkitty 7 points -2 points (+5|-7) ago  (edited ago)

Poor way to analyze data. (Exaggerated to illustrate the point) but theoretically we could have had 100 hurricanes from 2000 to 2017 and 19 from 1850 to 2000.

Sure you can compute the average of 119/(2017-1850) = .71 Hurricanes per year. But again that doesn't prove nor disprove anything because it does not consider any trends.

2
-1

[–] Philosopher_King 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

Woah sir, you go against the flow here on Voat, you'll be called a kike and downvoted. Climate change is like evolution in some ways, where the right winged, religious nuts denied evolution and ridiculed anyone for believing it. They brought up all these "proofs" and "facts" on how it was not real.

Now, most believe in it, though some still deny it.

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] weezkitty ago 

The most annoying part is that people don't realize that the source of the denial originated from the oil lobby