You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] White-Supremacist 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

You are right, I agree. I've thought about what you are referring to precisely. It's sometimes the conclusion of universal basic income paid for by taxes to 'the rich' which seems like one answer to this riddle, perhaps another relates to certain degrees of wealth limits. In the end, I don't really know what to call that, some hybrid of capitalism and socialism perhaps, maybe it's just a weak form of socialism, maybe you are absolutely right and I haven't put enough thought into the subject. Truthfully it's a subject I've feared and avoided to large degrees as so many other systems seem to go horribly wrong, I just hate the idea of concentrated power in the hands of few so the notion of a dictator pisses me off.

Some people try and say things like 'real communism has never been tried', although the definition of communism varies wildly from person to person. As I noted, I simply fear vastly too much power concentration, as the world bankers hold today.

0
0

[–] 10472961? ago 

I do too, and I find both the left and right wings to be playing with fire these days. To those who claim real communism hasn't been tried, I say, tell that to the tens if not hundreds of millions of people who died under these horrific regimes. Tell that to North Koreans who live it every day. Tell that to the Chinese, you know, the vast majority who live in poverty at such levels the poorest in America couldn't comprehend it. China puts on a false face, but is every bit communist. They've somewhat adopted a more capitalist-like economy, but they are communist to the core.

I'd argue that the banking oligarchy the west is under today is a de facto dictatorship. It also has the blood-thirst for ultimate power and control. I think this also contributes to the state of things today.