0
2

[–] wgtt911 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

hippy communes have tried it MANY MANY MANY times.. thinking it will grow and grow and grow.. but it just dies on the vine...

0
0

[–] Talc 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

It's not that it doesn't work at all, just that it doesn't scale to something the size of a modern nation state, and that any attempt at anything other than globalist ziofascism is immediately attacked. If ever you find yourself in charge of a nation of less than 200 people with pretty-much zero population growth and no jews you can implement communism just fine. Some of the hippy communes from the 60s are still functional today after 50 years.

It should be noted that capitalism / democracy has one of the same problems, the biggest difference is that when the kikes have ruined it they can still fool people into thinking it's a functional society. Take off the rose tinted glasses and you can clearly see that it is no such thing.

0
0

[–] Homelessfuck [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Exactly my point.

0
1

[–] 1True_Morty 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I see what you're saying.

Sort of like how this post title was imploded by the logic used to support it.

1
-1

[–] dontforgetaboutevil 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

What a moronic point. Especially considering that communism is the most basic form of human economics and goes back to the tribal era. During the tribal times all land is owned in common (or not owned and thus free for all to use). In other words the means of production are completely within the hands of each citizen and not capitalized on at all.

The city human being is the selfish and ugly creature who loves capitalism so much. Why? Because it is a control system. It allows rich people to tower over the poor and to gain unfair advantage after unfair advantage as a result. No man who is not rich can be free in a capitalistic society.

1
-1

[–] Homelessfuck [S] 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Lol, wrong. Even tribal cultures had traditions regarding personal property, barter, and and trade. Some assets might have been seen as communal, but Thok still would have smashed your brains in if you stole the flint knife he was planning to trade for a new shirt.

0
0

[–] dontforgetaboutevil 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

The point of communism isn't about not having private property. Private property also exists in communism. The point of communism is common ownership of THE MEANS OF PRODUCTION. I.e. in this example, the land/forest/minerals etc therein.

And this is why real communism has never been tried in the industrial age. It is a very different thing to say that the means of production are owned in common by all the people than to say that the means of production is owned by the government in the name of the people. We all know we can't trust governments. That doesn't change no matter what economic system you prefer.