You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →


[–] kevdude 2 points 12 points (+14|-2) ago 

He would have to provide sources for his claims.


[–] DefenderOfTruth 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

Oh, right. The pizzagate sub is pretty stickler about that....for good reason. It makes it hard for an "anonymous insider" to present a case though. How would you provide proof in that situation?


[–] kevdude 1 points 12 points (+13|-1) ago 

How would you provide proof in that situation?

He should be able to post coverage of events and details to show us a narrative chain. What has he really given us here? A claim that he was a detective and 2 youtube videos. Show us articles on busts that were painted as isolated incidents. He was a cop, he should know how to present evidence.


[–] Northern_Soul 6 points 5 points (+11|-6) ago 

What claims would that be kevdude?

Millennial falcon instantly deleted citing rule 3

Look at the public backlash... Its a fucking Joke and that prick needs to go!


[–] kevdude 2 points 7 points (+9|-2) ago 

He posted links to videos and did not describe their contents. He made claims in his post without providing evidence.

The PG sub is an investigative journal. There are plenty of other PG subs where people can forum slide with unsourced shitposts until their heart's content.