You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
The airstrike was never followed up on and did next to no damage. It was just political theater; it playing out in a foreign nation is simply a consequence of empire.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] [deleted] 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
[–] Whitemail 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
The airstrike in Syria didn't seem to be much more than a fireworks show. I still wonder why he would do it, though.
[–] Unreasonable 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
To destroy the oil that the CIA funded "rebels" were using.
We all realize the military is fractionalized and that the Army, Navy, Marines, CIA Black Ops, don't all work for the same goals.
Plus to kill the "narrative" that he was "soft on Russia and ISIS"
[–] ShinyVoater ago
The airstrike was never followed up on and did next to no damage. It was just political theater; it playing out in a foreign nation is simply a consequence of empire.