[–] DeadFox 14 points 13 points (+27|-14) ago 

Pick a side you cucks. Civil wars brewing. Do you want to be with the side that cares about whites, or the one that wants to genocide them?

[–] fitlord 5 points 20 points (+25|-5) ago 

Picking either a side with commie or a side with nazi flags is a false dichotomy. Fuck then both. Even if shit does start and some commissar or brownshirt assholes come to my house, there's always my rifle.

[–] callmejoshhh 6 points 4 points (+10|-6) ago 

Thank you. Fucking astonished by the number of people who seemingly support nazism. It was basically communist. Boo

[–] Armpit_and_Ass 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 



Fuck you, you spineless sap. Your vision of America is the version we have now. And it sucks.

[–] Uncle_Tractor 2 points 6 points (+8|-2) ago 

I'm on the side that rejects both commies and nazis. Let people live the lives they want to live as long as they don't hinder others from doing the same. Authoritarianism sucks, no matter the flavor.

[–] bob3333 3 points 2 points (+5|-3) ago  (edited ago)

The coming conflict will be authoritarianism vs. freedom, and authoritarianism will lose like it always does. We killed the shit out of the Nazis and commies before, and we'll do it again.

[–] 0fsgivin 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

Id look into the Oathkeepers

[–] JuiceTown 7 points 2 points (+9|-7) ago 

If supposed 'moderates' believe they can not pick a side to avoid the coming war, then they are diluting themselves. Burying your hand in the sand won't save you.

Pretending we're all one happy family just means you're going to get steam rolled when the bullets start flying. Nobody forms a movement or an army under the banner of 'meh'

[–] bob3333 3 points 5 points (+8|-3) ago  (edited ago)

Deluding is the word you are looking for, and moderates are not deluded. I will defend what is mine with deadly force against whomever threatens it. I don't give a fuck what flag you fly or what color you are, I will shoot you in the face at the drop of a hat if my life, my family, or my property is threatened.

[–] dorven 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

You are underestimating how many 'little r' republicans are in America, and how well armed they are.

Obviously, if I have to choose between authoritarian regimes, I'll pick the one that doesn't put my family up against the wall. But as it stands I have other options.

[–] BentAxel 6 points -3 points (+3|-6) ago 

The Moderates wont be the ones dying in any coming war. The Moderates will be watching the imbeciles of both sides eliminate themselves. And when one of those decides to walk off the field of battle, it will be the moderates that will shoot them dead so the problem is completely eliminated.

Then, they will go back to their lives like nothing ever happened. History Repeats.

[–] Samchay6 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Our grandfathers didn't need Nazis to explain to them the jews sucked. They figured it out all on their own.

[–] library_of_stupid 7 points 11 points (+18|-7) ago 

And then those same people wonder why they get shat on when one or the other group takes power. Turns out being a fence shitting cuck makes everyone hate you.

[–] bob3333 5 points 7 points (+12|-5) ago 

You mean makes everyone who's an extremist with no tolerance for freedom of thought hate you. That's a badge I wear proudly.

[–] weezkitty 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

Same. At least the conservative bias here doesn't make me sick like the liberal bias on Reddit. But extremism from either side isn't good

[–] Mylon 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

It's a function of First Past the Post Voting. Moderates will never be properly represented. The spoiler effect is real and it creates extremist political parties. Now when do you think Congress will pass a bill that changes the voting system that keeps them in office?

[–] DukeofAnarchy 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Our political parties do not represent extremes. They represent the far left and the not-so-far left.

[–] 0fsgivin 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

No I'm all for these groups beating each other. The only use for either is cannon fodder.

[–] badweather 5 points 10 points (+15|-5) ago  (edited ago)

anyone who showed up with a nazi flag should have been taken aside by several other protestors and told to put it away

these retards are either agent provacateurs trying to make the alt-right look bad or retards who don't understand the concept of pr

and this is coming from somebody who knows the truth about the holohaux, keep that stuff online where you can redpill with videos and pictures and shit, a flag ain't gonna convince anyone Nazis were the good guys

[–] RoBatten 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

I wish this would have happened. Those flags played right into their narrative . . .

[–] 0fsgivin 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Well actually the Alt-right term was first used by a Nazi. I agree nazis and commies are both scum.

[–] 8Ball 3 points 10 points (+13|-3) ago  (edited ago)

If the leftists get to say that Communists don't represent all of them and that "it wasn't real communism", then why do they also get to say that the KKK (which isn't even a right wing organization) and Nazis represent all rightists and that they are "racist" and "if you deny that then you're part of the problem"? Because double standards are wonderful.

[–] avgwhtguy1 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Because in America we value free speech more than free education

[–] EloquentOgre 9 points 4 points (+13|-9) ago 

Both these assholes are waving the flags of foreign nations hostile to the ideals of our own. Just because one asinine group of apologists ignores the atrocities and duplicitous history of the hammer and sickle and evils of Marxism doesn't mean that we are therefore free and right to welcome with open arms the Swastika and Hitler worshiping useful idiot controlled opposition "our side" is presented with.

[–] 8Ball 7 points 5 points (+12|-7) ago 

Yeah. Both of them are idiots.

[–] WEHRMACHT_BITCHES_AT 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 


[–] JuiceTown 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago  (edited ago)

My first thought too. When someone's carrying a banner that looks like they just removed it from its original packaging, it makes you wonder about their loyalty to their cause. For Christsake, iron out the fold creases. But it's even better if you rub it in the dirt and then shake it off, tear a hole in it and sew it back together, rub some blood into it and bind it to the stick with a shoe string. That's a battle flag

[–] bob3333 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

Or, you know, a battle flag could be a flag that was in an actual battle instead of carried around by pussies who have to fake one to give themselves an erection.

[–] OricaTonithos 10 points 8 points (+18|-10) ago 

The people of Walmart vs the people of Walmart.

[–] bambou1991 3 points 0 points (+3|-3) ago 

The Great Aisle 2 Civil War

[–] CrazyInAnInsaneWorld 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

I seem to have missed the part where the folks carrying the Confederate Battle Flag and the Reichstaag's Swastika were chucking bricks and bottles, and macing people with bear mace, at Charlottesville. Please respond with video citation of such.

Until then, pic related.

[–] bob3333 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago 

You're making OP's point. You don't understand PR.

[–] CrazyInAnInsaneWorld 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

OP's point seems to be that both groups presented are equally morally and legally repugnant, hence "like neither group presented to them." If you extracted a different point, I'd be glad to hear it, though I know from prior experience conversing with you that that will not likely be forthcoming...

My point was that I disagree with the above statement (that both groups are equally morally and legally repugnant), because it is objectively disprovable using the criteria I listed. I have video of Antifa and other Anti-UTR protestors engaging in pre-emptive violence...I have yet to see any of UTR doing the same. There's nothing PR-esque about it, unless you are accusing OP of being a shill for UTR. But even that doesn't make any sense, because why would a shill push his wares in a populace already friendly to their cause? Your shilling wouldn't even hit its intended targets...

[–] surprisecockfag 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

Being neutral because you don't know anything about a particular topic is one thing, but when you remain neutral after learning the facts, you're either spineless or a retard.

[–] 0rion 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

OP is a spineless retard.

load more comments ▼ (12 remaining)