0
24

[–] 8Ball 0 points 24 points (+24|-0) ago 

Barry Goldwater tried to explain this back in 1964. But he was simply slandered as a racist. The civil rights act was responsible for taking away the rights of countless business owners in the name of "desegregation" and giving an unprecedented amount of power to the federal government. And I agree, the free market provides enough businesses to serve everyone, so if one of them decides to discriminate, they should be allowed to do so. Surely there are other businesses willing to accommodate.

0
12

[–] acheron2012 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The civil rights act was the greatest infringement on Personal Freedom since the Sherman Anti-Trust Act 70 years earlier. Free association is a basic human right equal to the right to, and in many ways just another facet of, self preservation.

Pro Tip: The Sherman Anti-Trust act did not make monopolies illegal. It made non-government sponsored monopolies much harder to shepherd through the legal system. Mostly it destroyed competition by raising the bar for entry into an industry and was one of the largest boons for the legal industry in history.

0
8

[–] 8Ball 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Yep. Progressives have everything backwards. They helped JP Morgan, a vile monopolist, achieve his manipulative goals by passing his Sherman anti-trust act. It should really be called the Sherman pro-monopoly act.

0
8

[–] chaos63 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

I honestly do not understand why anyone would really want to shop at a place or eat at a place they are not wanted. Every place has its own culture and you either play along with the dominant culture or you move on to somewhere the culture is more in line with your expectations. Don't like 'homophobes'? Then why the fuck would you insist on a 'homophobe' baked cake? There is a lovely Morgan Freeman interview where he gets asked what he thinks about a nearby golf club not taking black members and he says he doesn't play golf so it is none of his business and if he did play golf, he wouldn't play with people who didn't want to play with him. No fuss, no drama, no lawsuits, find a place you're welcome or if none exists, build a place where people like you can do their own unique thing.

0
6

[–] EngelbertHumperdinck 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Solution: only sell merchandise that appeals to your preferred group. Or make it known that some of your profits will be donated to a charity they wouldn't like. Don't like black thugs in your store? Post a sign that says 10% of all proceeds go to police and offer a discount to cops. Don't like muslims? All purchases come with free bacon. Eat the bacon in the store and get a discount. Don't like SJWs? 10% of all proceeds will be donated to Trump, etc.

0
5

[–] LordRygon 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Whether or not it's allowed, it still exists. Stores in the black neighborhoods of inner cities will give shit service to any white male that walks in, if not openly discriminate. Tyrone at Poppy's Corner Five and Dime doesn't care about the law. His pricing includes structure includes the "white guy premium" and the "homeboy discount."

0
5

[–] Goathole 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

That's the way it should be. On a person by person basis or group. So if a person is a shitty customer, no entry. If a group of people are continually shitty customers, no group.

It would also make groups self regulate. "Fuck Tyrone! Don' be stealin' sheeit cuz den I cants be goin' inta da store eethur".

It would also create businesses that cater to groups that other people don't want to serve. "Hey Tyrone, we kin go ta dat store cuz he don't minds if we steal. He jus jacks up da price on sheeit for evbody else to makes up fer eet.".

0
8

[–] Neinlife 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

I have black friends who regularly talk shit about 'niggers ruinin shit for black folks' this is a good point.

0
3

[–] sbt2160p 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

It would also make groups self regulate. "Fuck Tyrone! Don' be stealin' sheeit cuz den I cants be goin' inta da store eethur".

This is a good point.

0
2

[–] lissencarak 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Implying niggers have the time preference for that

You will learn in time to your sorrow

2
4

[–] hatrickpatrick 2 points 4 points (+6|-2) ago 

Think this one through for a moment - conservatives, right wing folk and anti-feminists are currently social and political pariahs in "polite society". If companies were allowed to discriminate in this manner, think about how much worse the situation would become in colleges. Think about how many restaurants and cafes etc would ban anyone associated with the right or wearing a MAGA cap. Think about how difficult it would become for the right to find anyone willing to make its merchandise and shit.

I'm surprised at how popular this idea is, given that we're already seeing how so many in the establishment are trying to effectively shun those who don't swallow the establishment line on everything to the sidelines and muzzle them as human beings... This would massively help them with that.

0
7

[–] dontdoxxmefaggots 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

don't be fucking retarded

conservatives are the majority of citizens here, don't let the jew lies make you believe otherwise

trump won the election, and would've won the popular vote if not for the hordes of illegal beaners voting for clinton

0
4

[–] 10088003 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

it seems that way because only regressives running media empires and colleges are making all of the noise and setting the tone

if it were legal, the crazies would be drowned out by the chant of "we want everyone's money, not just money from X". and if it started to look like there'd be discrimination against the silent majority, you can bet that companies would loudly support them to draw in more business.

At the end of the day, dollars matter more than liberal feelings.

0
1

[–] chaos63 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

And think of the commercial opportunities for conservative friendly establishments that would open? The free market would satisfy the millions of conservatives and many liberals would not lose money turning away conservatives if they started to feel the pinch as conservative friendly places opened up. Very few people have enough hate to lose money over it.

0
0

[–] hels 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Have you not followed major companies virtue signaling and then watch their stocks drop a few percent in the following days and weeks? Some examples -- that lumber company commercial during the superbowl, clothing stores dropping Ivanka Trump's line, that coffee shop who vowed to only hire immigrants..... but then we have Black Rifle Coffee who vowed to hire Vets and guess what folks?? That was beneficial for the company.

0
3

[–] aria_taint 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I would have no problem with store banning "teens" as the news calls them. Teens is news speak for young feral niggers who buy noting, steal, and cause trouble in groups.

0
2

[–] Unreasonable 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

"WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO REFUSE SERVICE TO ANYONE AT ANYTIME FOR ANY REASON."

Ummm the Constitution protects your right to free association. In Business as well. You are free to associate, or not associate, with whomever you wish.

This garbage lawsuits of "muh discrimination" isn't a real application of the law.

Simply don't tell them WHY you're asking them to leave your privately owned establishment.

load more comments ▼ (18 remaining)