0
4

[–] ScreaminMime 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Well, point 7 is arguable.

0
0

[–] NeoGoat 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

:-)

0
3

[–] 9874906? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

False equivalency. Their technology in the periods described limited the reach of the constant and intense fighting in the region.

Compare during a time where the tech levels were more similar... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIeG_0WfaJw

You also have to take into account what those who fought those wars/took over those lands added to them in the same period of time. There is a reason muslim countries are using western/asian technology like medicine, cell phones, computers, cars, RPGs, etc and not the other way around.

0
2

[–] penisse 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I think the Muslims did terribly good when it comes to the Slavery.

0
2

[–] Goater 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Point 3 is retarded. There was not 20 million aboriginals in Australia before colonisation.

Fuck, I'd be surprised if there were more than a few hundred thousand. The Australian outback does not support large populations without agriculture.

0
2

[–] NeoGoat 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Most American, and I presume Australian, natives were killed by disease.

0
1

[–] Hillarysdrycunt 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

We would probably be traveling to distant planets by now if it wasn't for fucking Muslims. There is a good goddamn reason you don't see sand niggers on sci-fi shows like Star Trek.