You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
14

[–] parrygrin 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

So I looked up SB 967. It definitely fucks with evidentiary standards in a horrifying way.

Is there any case law wherein somebody claimed they were too drunk to consent but that argument didn't hold up or was defeated somehow?

0
10

[–] Lobotomy 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

This is why you don't California even once.

0
5

[–] Anonymous_User_69 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

It's not drunk driving if you can't give your consent to drive.