You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
lifesitenews dishonestly summarized the study. It took aim at a particular government program (that among other things distributed free contraceptives to students). It never concluded that sex-ed classes don't help. It even cites a study that indicates more comprehensive sex ed reduces teen pregnancy.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Uncle_Tractor 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Hmyeah ... either the UK is/was doing sex-ed really wrong, or lifesitenews has a very strong bias against sex-ed.
[–] Newtonip 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
lifesitenews dishonestly summarized the study. It took aim at a particular government program (that among other things distributed free contraceptives to students). It never concluded that sex-ed classes don't help. It even cites a study that indicates more comprehensive sex ed reduces teen pregnancy.
See my other post.
[–] WakkoWarner ago
https://youtu.be/m4kXF7RjsJE