0
47

[–] LuciusAM 0 points 47 points (+47|-0) ago 

If you look at the list of sites that have disproved the "conspiracy" you will see all you need lol.

This is why you cannot cite Wikipedia as a source, people can put anything they want on there and call it fact.

0
50

[–] 9300914? 0 points 50 points (+50|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Pretty impressive that they managed to "debunk" the "conspiracy theory" without actually catching the killer.

0
34

[–] DasReich 0 points 34 points (+34|-0) ago 

Bro, they cited snopes! Case closed.

0
12

[–] damnittohell 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I want to start calling the OJ Simpson murders a debunked wild right wing conspiracy theory. He was found innocent after all.

0
0

[–] ClandenCTrake [S] ago 

Bazinga!

0
8

[–] burns29 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

And concluded the Russia investigation even though it is still active in the FBI and Congressional Committee.

0
3

[–] ArtsyLiberationz 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

i agree wikipedia is often BS now hijacked by the SJW agenda? but where else do we go if you need a free online encyclopedia on current events? I noticed their bias first on politician pages years back but especially recently like when you looked at the terms like 'regressive left' Some of them honestly thought regressive left was a rightwing racist alt-right snarl word against leftism...I mean WTF http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Regressive_left/Archive1

0
1

[–] sinclair 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

yah, and not a single fact about WHERE (the street) he was found on. This whole article is light on facts.

0
1

[–] ClandenCTrake [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

light on facts.

0
43

[–] GuyIDisagreeWith 0 points 43 points (+43|-0) ago 

I was halfway through the second paragraph when I won the buzzword bingo.

0
7

[–] SithEmpire 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

You have nostalgia'd me for the classic Dilbert reference.

0
1

[–] RevanProdigalKnight 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Bingo, sir.

0
31

[–] HomerChimpson 0 points 31 points (+31|-0) ago 

Infogalactic. Wikipedia is fake news.

0
5

[–] 9301138? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

What the fuck is going on at infogalactic. I tried to make an account and says I have already requested one, which I never have.

0
1

[–] prairie 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

So good it knows your actions better than you.

0
0

[–] wesofx ago 

I just tried too and got the same response.

0
1

[–] crustyjuggler 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Thanks for the link. It looks like a non-cucked version of wiki-cuckia.

0
0

[–] gauss_markov ago 

Give it time

0
26

[–] eyeman 0 points 26 points (+26|-0) ago 

I stopped at "New York times, Washington Post, La Times had proven that these allegations are fake news"

If a fake news company is claiming it is fake it must be double true.

0
10

[–] BlueDrache 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

I find it double plus ungood, fellow Party member.

1
2

[–] damnittohell 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

Politburo called. No potato for yourself. Your children and wife will receive raped and tortured comrade.

0
0

[–] ineedbettername ago 

Why you joke about this? Politburo don't have phone. Don't have potato either, such is life.

0
20

[–] Tor1 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Anyone can edit this article.

Talk

It's extremely obvious that the article does not display a neutral point of view. While most information is factual, it reads like a chronological left-slanted news article rather than an encyclopedia. The NPOV concern tag should be added, as the current state of the article is an embarrassment and needs a lot of work to meet Wikipedia's standards.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Murder_of_Seth_Rich#It.27s_extremely_obvious_that

[–] [deleted] 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] ErrantCognition 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

But then half the screen will be an ebegging banner

0
10

[–] djsumdog 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

I've found the talk page is often more valuable than the articles themselves.

0
0

[–] damnittohell ago 

Jeffrey Cooper page and talk page had similar slants when I read them. WP is trash.

0
4

[–] gauss_markov 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Hilarious that from the talk page it can be clearly seen that wikipedia is nothing more than a regurgitation of whatever the Jewish media vomits out

0
13

[–] fuckyouIaintgotjokes 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

some days it feels like there may never be justice for the Clinton crime family

0
2

[–] antiliberalsociety 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Some days? Try every day they breathe free air.

0
11

[–] dv1155 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

You can just fix it. Wikipedia is the encyclopedia anybody can edit! Oh wait.

This page is protected. You do not have permission to edit it.

0
5

[–] littul_kitton 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

0
3

[–] ChanceofRain 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

This page is extended-protected until September 4, 2017 due to editing disputes.

This is why Wiki is worthless. The narrative is censored and controlled at every chance.

0
11

[–] Bill_Murrays_Sandals 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago  (edited ago)

"The fabrications were described as fake news and falsehoods, by The New York Times, The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times."

Ah yes, the ones in the pocket of, and potentially connected to the ones that did this.

And fact checked by the 2 fat fucks and their fat cat in Snopes as well?! Ah shit.

Pack it up boys, it's over, nothing suspicious about Seth Rich's murder, nothing in the slightest, stop asking questions, go back to bed America watch this, shut up.

0
8

[–] neogag 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Wapo literally employs Podesta......

0
8

[–] Bill_Murrays_Sandals 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago  (edited ago)

And NYT has Mark Thompson who tried to cover up the Jimmy Saville case.

load more comments ▼ (30 remaining)