You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
15

[–] Chiefpacman 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

Talk about lack of personal freedoms. Poor Canadians :/

1
4

[–] jerry 1 point 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

I just wanna drag on my cancer stick in peace :/

10
-6

[–] Myrv 10 points -6 points (+4|-10) ago 

Except this wasn't really about personal freedom. You can smoke in your own personal car as long there are no children in it (which I believe is a good rule). Problem was, his car was registered to his business and you are not allowed to smoke in the workplace (which I also believe is a good rule). So either this guy was breaking the law by registering a personal vehicle as a business vehicle or he was smoking in the workplace (he can't have it both ways). Looks like he successfully defended himself by saying the vehicle was only ever used for personal use which means Revenue Canada should now be knocking on his door about his "business" expense.

0
14

[–] ilovepussy 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Except, that as an officer of the company, and not an employee, a company vehicle may well be a perk, and even though it is only used as a personal vehicle, and not a work vehicle, it would still be legal, and not a workplace. Thereby, complying with both. Which is what I think the court determined.

0
5

[–] goatsandbros 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

"It's the law, so it must be right!"

Go suck Kathleen Wynn's dick, faggot.

0
3

[–] Chiefpacman 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

What is personal freedom in your opinion?

Your argument isnt really maning sense. What you're trying to say is, in this case it's okay for personal liberties to be infringed.