You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

4
3

[–] go1dfish 4 points 3 points (+7|-4) ago 

Also don't take this to be I told you so, we were all there at some point.

Trump is one persuasive mother fucker too, even this guy bought into it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igbBItLemsM

No blame, no shame, just love and r[evol]ution.

0
4

[–] The_End_is_Near 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

It was always a reluctant vote anyways. This was a shitty bag of candidates. Rand Paul wouldn't have bombed Syria, but I doubt he would have beat the cunt.

0
1

[–] lorlipone 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Agreed. I'm fundamentally libertarian, but I couldn't have supported Johnson. Dude was just no Ron Paul. I wish someone could talk Tom Woods and Andrew Napolitano into running.

0
1

[–] oiseaulibre 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Gary Johnson couldn't have bombed Syria though, because he probably wouldn't be able to find it on the map.

2
2

[–] EngelbertHumperdinck [S] 2 points 2 points (+4|-2) ago 

Hey go1dfish, I almost pinged you in my post. I figured you might have something to add.

By the way, Molyneux is a 911 gatekeeper, just like his idol, Chomsky. He's like an Alex Jones for intellectuals. Check out his episode entitled, "The 911 Truth Debate, Yes Really!" He debates a guy who is an admitted novice when it comes to 911 truth, and in the process, abandons all his principles and resorts to sophistry. It's like he's a different person altogether. He even cuts the guy off and ends the show with a close minded suggestion that we should just 'forget about 911 because it doesn't matter anyway'.

0
2

[–] MaunaLoona 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

His "debate" on free will is even more dishonest, if you can believe it.