1
3

[–] greyhunter4 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

Prob not the best place to ask but there were talks that wikileaks was compromised back in October? and new stuff should be held skeptically. To those familiar has anything changed?

I haven't dived into vault 7 myself, just read summaries but I could see why the gov wants you to think it knows all, can see all, and can do anything. Not that it's that far fetched at all. Google's logs on people are insane.

0
4

[–] 1moar [S] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I believe very little in anything these days except myself and the juice. It's fine to ask here imo, I didn't post it for internet points but as a means of having these sorts of exchanges.

You pose an interesting scenario. Since the Snowden bomb, we've learned quite a bit of their capabilities. I wouldn't put it past them to have a campaign like this. Look at the internet itself and things like Tor; both were devised by US military/intelligence. I don't differentiate between the two really, but someone in another thread made comment how they wouldn't let go of everything in the interest of freedom and goodwill.

At this stage of my life and what I've experienced, I just assume everything is compromised and behave accordingly. I don't really self-censor, as I am a pretty normal dude. I guess the bigger question is, can this cat be put back in the bag short of tearing it all down?

Edit - a letter

1
2

[–] savageslav 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago  (edited ago)

It is not that news is fake, problem is that they claim to be unbiased source of information when in fact they are not.

No one in their right mind can claim that one side that until recently had less than 25% of legislative power is solely responsible for wrong doing and that other side that at the time majority and now complete control over entire legislature is just an innocent by stander.

If we seek the truth and truly stand for freedom of our country than we need to call out bullshit no matter what is the source is or where information comes form.

0
3

[–] rail606 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

To tell you the real truth about wikileaks they are biased. Biased against the Powers-That-Be. Don't you remembre when they released a bunch of shit during the bush years and the republicans were like fuck wikileaks? Wikileaks knows the truth. There is no such thing as democrat or republican. There is only good and evil. And it is on both sides of the aisle. To think either democrats or republicans are fully responsible for the mess in America is dim witted. The Rothschild banking organization knows no political boundaries.

0
0

[–] Sir_Ocaz 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Isn't it a bit suspicious Trump says Obama wiretapped him and then a couple of days later we get vault 7 reveal?

Does anyone really believe the CIA wasn't ready for an event like this, who says they didn't actually plan for this? This all seems too fishy.

Another theory I heard is they're planning an internet false flag attack/event so they can finally centralize internet access.

1
-1

[–] eagleshigh 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Didn't Assange specifically say that if they had any dirt on Trumpstein that they wouldn't leak it? That's the definition of biased.

1
2

[–] OKythen 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

IF wikileaks were dangerous to the state it would have been shut the fuck DOWN.

1
0

[–] ravensedgesom 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

seem to be controlled opposition

4
1

[–] o_V_o 4 points 1 points (+5|-4) ago 

I don't care what's being said, if it has that gay-ass mask associated with it, I'm going to shit all over it.

BTW, the way I keep seeing "BTFO" being used in headlines here reminds of me of feminists crying RAPE! when someone looks at them funny. Either way, you're a bunch of insufferable poseurs.

0
3

[–] 1moar [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I actually agree with you on both points. I felt a little dirty about the title. Oh well.

2
0

[–] jerry 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

Who upvoats this shit? This is what you post on facebook. Not voat. Discuss that topic material with proof and links to read on. That would be a good post. Not this shit. Fuck this post and fuck the Reddit fags who upvoated it

0
1

[–] 3dk 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

This is good ammunition for the ongoing meme wars. Why not upvote it, so more people see it and post it to their facekike/twatter?

0
0

[–] jerry 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Because facebook is for retards, and you are slightly retarded for still using it

0
1

[–] eagleshigh 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

People love may mays.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] jerry 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Great comment... you pointed out the subverse we are in good job detective

1
0

[–] AOLtrialCDfrisbee 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

i agree that the general narrative is skeptical when these are released and feels as if mainstream news sources are suggesting to take the info being released with a grain of salt but my petty side is cringing at the background pic.

0
0

[–] pissed 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I don't recall anyone (MSM, govn't) saying the info from Wikileaks was not accurate.

0
9

[–] anonnynonny 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

There's the constant narrative of "IF these are valid," "alleged documents," and in the case of the email leaks it was "they could have been manipulated or edited."