[–] [deleted] 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
3

[–] HamsterSlayer 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

She is not a static entity! She is in fact a human person subject to change! Change is scary! Hitler wanted change! BURN THE WITCH!!

0
3

[–] derram 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

https://archive.is/pM7M1 | :

Emma Watson's fans accuse her of promoting skin lightening over Lancome campaign | Daily Mail Online

'Fans of Harry Potter actor Emma Watson have taken to Twitter in horror after discovering that Emma Watson was the face of a skin lightening product. ', "Twitter user @SpareMeMary wrote 'I used to love Emma Watson and now she's an advocate for skin lightening...#peoplechange'."

'Call me naïve, but I am crushed that Emma Watson is the face of skin bleaching products. ', "How white does she want to be?'Another, named @jennywhojenny seemed angry at the apparent hypocrisy of Emma Watson, UN Women Goodwill Ambassador, promoting a skin lightening beauty product.", "Skin whitening products endorsed? #beauty products we don't need!'One user called @SpyEast pointed out that Watson#s already fair complexion seemed a bad fit for the add: 'Emma Watson is the face of Lancome skin whitening product?"

This has been an automated message.

0
3

[–] IfIDidIt [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Since she has some sort of new movie coming out, it might be fun to disseminate this to the general public.

0
2

[–] serjsbeard 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Wait so let me get this straight: Liberals are okay with someone getting a tan... But liberals are not okay with someone wanting lighter skin? I get the odd feeling that liberals might be just anti-white

0
2

[–] IfIDidIt [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Exactly. It works as a subtle redpill for others when they watch the hatred pour out for white people. Even non-whites will often be repulsed by the sheer racism that will come out against her for something that was largely beyond her control. In this way we use her face to make other whites see the narrative/agenda being pushed against them. Thus a feminist takes the fall/abuse for it, and that abuse will serve as a teaching instrument for others.

0
1

[–] Dalai_Llama 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Actually, you're racist if you aren't doing regular tanning. The only reason why you wouldn't be proactively making yourself darker is racism. You should devote a significant portion of your schedule to doing this. I'm surprised you don't already.

0
2

[–] antiliberalsociety 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Filed under:

Who the fuck gives a shit?

0
1

[–] robster95602 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

It seems the SJWs are intentionally misrepresenting the entire focus of this product. I'm getting the impression this is intended to lighten unnaturally dark spots in order to to blend with existing skin tone, not to change or lighten an entire complexion AKA getting a reverse tan. Using this product in bulk would be chemically unsound, for starters. Now if a dark skinned person developed unnaturally light colored splotches, I would bet even money they would likely want to darken those spots to match their natural skin color, especially if irregularly shaped. Michael Jackson excepted, of course. Just sayin'