You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
They see Trump and his supporters as the harbingers of doom. It's not so much that they're in favor of the violence, but they feer that movement must be stopped at any cost. In part they're right. Our society has a system for filtering out criminals, so it should be able to accept refugees and treet them equally and the criminals will get filtered out via the criminal justice system. But in practice, when the shit starts hitting the fan, people rightfully look to see who throwing the shit and demand that it stop immediately rather than through the normal criminal justice system. Society is heading to war, so they correctly identified that the harbingers of doom will be the stronger side when all hell breaks loose, but they've failed to correctly identify the cause and therefore the solution. They figure it's just in the other side's nature to be discriminatory, tribalistic, and warlike, but what they don't realize is that that the cause is an irresistible response to danger from others and that even they are susceptible to this response. The question is whether they'll have bad experiences with the refugees and switch sides, or whether they'll continue to see Trump and his supporters as the initial provocateurs. War is coming to Europe in America will want to go fight for one side or another, If we stay out we can keep the peace at home, but may lose Europe, our ancestral home. But if engage in the fight, we'll have the honor of trying to defend our ancestral homeland against the invading hoards by the billions, but we'll also have to fight a civil war here at home.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] varialus 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
They see Trump and his supporters as the harbingers of doom. It's not so much that they're in favor of the violence, but they feer that movement must be stopped at any cost. In part they're right. Our society has a system for filtering out criminals, so it should be able to accept refugees and treet them equally and the criminals will get filtered out via the criminal justice system. But in practice, when the shit starts hitting the fan, people rightfully look to see who throwing the shit and demand that it stop immediately rather than through the normal criminal justice system. Society is heading to war, so they correctly identified that the harbingers of doom will be the stronger side when all hell breaks loose, but they've failed to correctly identify the cause and therefore the solution. They figure it's just in the other side's nature to be discriminatory, tribalistic, and warlike, but what they don't realize is that that the cause is an irresistible response to danger from others and that even they are susceptible to this response. The question is whether they'll have bad experiences with the refugees and switch sides, or whether they'll continue to see Trump and his supporters as the initial provocateurs. War is coming to Europe in America will want to go fight for one side or another, If we stay out we can keep the peace at home, but may lose Europe, our ancestral home. But if engage in the fight, we'll have the honor of trying to defend our ancestral homeland against the invading hoards by the billions, but we'll also have to fight a civil war here at home.