You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] betadynamique 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

This idea of the Russians are the hackers, but there's always the Russians more or less as the other nations at any given time, so this isn't news. What is news is why all of the sudden are the Russians capable of hacking into anyone's brains to make them vote one way or another. This I do not think is possible, just waiting for someone to tell me that I only think it because Russians told me so. I'm already programmed to laugh about it.

0
1

[–] DrJamesA [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

This one isn't about whether the accusation of Russian hacking is novel, but investigation of the facts that would have had to be in play in order for Russia to pull it off. Not many news outlets are covering that part, and asking the tough questions.

What the mainstream media is also ignoring is that we all had incriminating information on Hillary from several other sources. Even the National Enquirer had whistle-blowers reporting to them that were former Clinton employees. Since the NE never made any list of "fake news", everything they wrote must have been true! But there was Project Veritas, Hillary's prior record (or lack thereof), her college paper on Saul Alinsky, Whitewater, Danny Williams (Bill Clinton's black son), the chef for Hillary Clinton that testified she referred to blacks as "N*****", Dinesh D'Souza's documentary on the real history of the Democratic Party ("Hillary's America") Breitbarts documentary ("Clinton Cash"), etc...There was plenty of dirt on Hillary beyond what Wikileaks provided that would have been more than sufficient to defeat her.

If and when you do laugh, hopefully, the programming isn't in Russian!

0
0

[–] betadynamique ago 

ТРУМП