You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

11
7

[–] The_Cat 11 points 7 points (+18|-11) ago  (edited ago)

Got an actual source for this?

EDIT: Found a Snopes link. Apparently a manual was updated to have some more gender neutral language, but no group ever demanded this or was offended by it. Misleading.

Snopes.

0
21

[–] obvious-throwaway-- 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago 

gender neutral language

Yeah, we wouldn't to give the misconception that only females can have children.

0
15

[–] WitnesstheSalt 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

Fuck, before the election I just assumed Snopes was 100% clean. But then they got into political shit.

http://yournewswire.com/snopes-caught-lying-for-hillary-again-questions-raised/

Now I see a Snopes link and I ask myself if they're playing an angle.

0
0

[–] 7132708? 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I ask myself if they're playing an angle.

everyone plays an angle. its just that some are truthful about it and others arent.

0
10

[–] peacegnome 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

although i don't doubt it in this case, snopes has a horrible track record for many things PC or politics related.

13
-13

[–] The_Cat 13 points -13 points (+0|-13) ago 

How so? As far as I know, snopes has an excellent track record all around.

2
1

[–] soae 2 points 1 points (+3|-2) ago 

Thanks for keeping us all sane! :)

4
-2

[–] The_Cat 4 points -2 points (+2|-4) ago 

Just doing my duty!