You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
[–]greycloud2 points
-2 points
0 points
(+0|-2)
ago
after a couple generations it would change for the better. human's natural state is polygyny (polygamy with multiple wives). your assumption relies on the idea that nothing else would change, but that is FAR from the truth. a huge amount of things would change. not the least of which men would produce less (individually, not just because of the lower population). women's behavior would change a lot.
[–]greycloud1 point
-1 points
0 points
(+0|-1)
ago
i guess if you are gay and don't want to have to put with women then this would be a bad thing. i am radically liberal so i don't mind homosexuals. i do see homosexual men losing out if this were the case.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] greycloud 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
after a couple generations it would change for the better. human's natural state is polygyny (polygamy with multiple wives). your assumption relies on the idea that nothing else would change, but that is FAR from the truth. a huge amount of things would change. not the least of which men would produce less (individually, not just because of the lower population). women's behavior would change a lot.
[–] heili 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Polygyny is another one of the reasons why an overly female society would suck ass. I'd be surrounded by nothing but estrogen. Rather die.
[–] greycloud 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
i guess if you are gay and don't want to have to put with women then this would be a bad thing. i am radically liberal so i don't mind homosexuals. i do see homosexual men losing out if this were the case.