You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
8

[–] nottashill 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I can't wait till the strong and sadistic must reclaim the world from the weak and feminine and all their civilization crippling antics.

0
7

[–] 6982339? 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Every civilization is a fruit from the sturdy tree of barbarism, and falls at the greatest distance from its trunk.

0
2

[–] nottashill 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

That's really an awesome metaphor.

0
2

[–] acheron2012 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Unfortunately evolution's chosen path seems to be islam. Granted they are more civilization destroying than civilization crippling. But on the current trend the free world will lose this generational war of attrition.

However after the US falls Russia and China are going to embark on a genocidal campaign that will rival Noah's Biblical Flood. Numerically I suppose this means that eventually the entire world will be populated with nothing but Chinese.

0
4

[–] nottashill 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

You're assuming people are just going to "let Islam do it's thing".

No. I won't.

1
2

[–] eagleshigh 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Evolutions "chosen path" (whatever that means) is one of randomness, variety and diversity, not one uniform line. Evolution is non-teleological.

Another widespread erroneous view of natural selection must also be refuted: Selection is not teleological (goal-directed). Indeed, how could an elimination process be teleological? Selection does not have a long-term goal. It is a process repeated anew in every generation. The frequency of extinction of evolutionary lineages, as well as frequent changes in direction, is inconsistent with the mistaken claim that evolution is a teleological process. Also, there is no known genetic mechanism that could produce goal-directed evolutionary processes. Orthogenesis and other proposed teleological processes have been thoroughly refuted (see Chapter 4).

To say it in other words, evolution is not deterministic. The evolutionary process consists of a large number of interactions. Different genotypes within a single population may respond differently to the same change of the environment. These changes, in turn, are unpredictable, particularly when caused by the arrival at a locality of a new predator or competitor. Survival during a mass extinction may strongly be affected by chance. (Mayr, 1964: 121)

Ernst Mayr---What Evolution Is

Even then, from an evolutionary perspective, the point of life is reproduction, not production (van den Berghe 1981), so looking at it from an evolutionary perspective, who's more fit? An Arab Muslim or African (reproduction) or a European (production)?

0
0

[–] dontforgetaboutevil ago 

Bah this is not necessary. If the western powers would leave the middle east alone they would happily go back to slaughtering each other and arguing over how to pronounce to Allah or whatever they fight about.

Seriously, let's just develop renewable power, cut off the funds to these sand dicks and let them reap the fruits of their rotten culture.

0
2

[–] ExpertShitposter [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Hopefully that happens automatically since these guys wont reproduce.

0
7

[–] nottashill 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Nope. I'm from the South. I see first hand that if it's got a pulse, it reproduces. Mental capacity, IQ, doesn't matter. In fact, the smarter you are, the less likely you are to reproduce.

The idiots are filling the earth. We can't be allowed to reach our own "desalinization". If that happens, well, I guess I'll just have to buy more ammo.