Archived In speaking about a possible civil war, a way to count *some* of the probable participants. (whatever)
submitted ago by Crensch
Posted by: Crensch
Posting time: 4.1 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 2/12/2017 1:51:00 AM
Views: 295
SCP: 5
6 upvotes, 1 downvotes (86% upvoted it)
Archived In speaking about a possible civil war, a way to count *some* of the probable participants. (whatever)
submitted ago by Crensch
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Crensch-no-education 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago (edited ago)
You're a feeble-minded idiot who can't stop sucking authorities' dicks, idiot. What's the refutation of p2? Use words instead of names. But you can't. You got nothing.
You can reply with some idiotic thing like "hurf durf me on the side of reeality u not me smart u dumdum". Dumb idiot.
But you CAN'T reply with ANYTHING that constitutes an adequate reply to p2.
@eagleshigh @bojangles @SarMegahhikkitha
[–] Crensch [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
P2 requires a reality that does not exist.
What part of this do you not understand, you uneducated, delusional, low IQ subhuman?
FOR P2 TO EXIST, OUR LAWS OF PHYSICS HAVE TO WORK OUTSIDE OUR UNIVERSE.
In which case Hawking, Krauss, and MUH CARROLL say that your god is unnecessary.
IF OUR LAWS OF PHYSICS DO NOT HOLD OUTSIDE OUR UNIVERSE
Then you get your Ellis who says you cannot suggest anything at all about it.
You fail so hard, a second grader could follow this line of thought, yet you cannot.
[–] Crensch-no-education 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
CLASSIC!
Quoted to preserve your stupidity.
@eagleshigh @bojangles @SarMegahhikkitha