Archived In speaking about a possible civil war, a way to count *some* of the probable participants. (whatever)
submitted ago by Crensch
Posted by: Crensch
Posting time: 4.1 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 2/12/2017 1:51:00 AM
Views: 295
SCP: 5
6 upvotes, 1 downvotes (86% upvoted it)
Archived In speaking about a possible civil war, a way to count *some* of the probable participants. (whatever)
submitted ago by Crensch
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Crensch-no-education 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago (edited ago)
@eagleshigh @bojangles @SarMegahhikkitha
The terms actuality and potentiality and prime mover are superior at explaining change than science void of metaphysics and final causes.
It's always been about the argument with me. You're a feeble-minded idiot who can't stop sucking authorities' dicks, idiot. What's the refutation of p2? Use words instead of names. But you can't. You got nothing.
You can reply with some idiotic thing like "hurf durf me on the side of reeality u not me smart u dumdum". Dumb idiot.
But you CAN'T reply with ANYTHING that constitutes an adequate reply to p2.
[–] Crensch [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Your argument fails before it starts. You have nothing.
[–] Crensch-no-education 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago (edited ago)
You're a feeble-minded idiot who can't stop sucking authorities' dicks, idiot. What's the refutation of p2? Use words instead of names. But you can't. You got nothing.
You can reply with some idiotic thing like "hurf durf me on the side of reeality u not me smart u dumdum". Dumb idiot.
But you CAN'T reply with ANYTHING that constitutes an adequate reply to p2.
@eagleshigh @bojangles @SarMegahhikkitha