People are being killed all over the world in the name of one religion. Are we going to keep pretending this religion's beliefs isn't at odds with our own written law?
If I owned a newspaper it's headline Saturday morning would have read 'Freedom of Religion' with a large picture of all the dead French in the road.
They are not allowing us freedom from their religion, and thus, do not belong in our countries that share this ideal.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] iamjanesleftnipple 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
It also doesn't say "Freedom of Religion". But really what you're doing is playing semantics. The Bill of Rights states that the state shall establish no religion, which translates to no religion being forced onto the people that they do not freely elect to follow themselves (a point you already made in your comment in regards to England). Thus it is by default both freedom of religion (worship how you want to worship so long as it doesn't harm anyone else) and freedom from religion ( you won't be forced to have a religion).
[–] fuck_communism 3 points 1 point 4 points (+4|-3) ago
Oh, the irony.
The First Amendment prohibits the United States Congress from making laws with respect to the practice of religion. It does not prohibit states, counties, or local municipalities from doing so, therefore, it does not guarantee "freedom from religion," or "freedom of religion."
[–] iamjanesleftnipple 2 points 3 points 5 points (+5|-2) ago
You apparently haven't heard of the Supremacy Clause, which does exactly what you claim can't happen - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supremacy_Clause
IE, the State cannot make a religion, that state means Federal, State, Counties, Local, etc. It goes from the top all the way down.