You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
12

[–] CobraStallone 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

What announcement would you be referring to?

And, yeah, welcome and shit, took you long enough.

0
8

[–] jewellious 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

The other site made an announcement double downing that they were all about free speech and transparency, but just wanted to filter out some of the "evil". Someone asked them to define, "evil." I'm not sure what the response was or if the question was answered.

0
5

[–] ForgotMyName 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

There's no response that would be defensible if you're actually all about free speech and transparency. Either you're for those things, or you're not. You can't say, "Yes, free speech except..." The moment you add any arbitrary conditions to it, you are no longer for it. Note: I do not feel that Voat's stance - any legal speech is allowable - is arbitrary.

0
2

[–] CobraStallone 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Oh OK. Geez. No comment would have been way better.

0
0

[–] Throwingtothewolves [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

They answer was BS and not worth reading or repeating.

0
1

[–] Throwingtothewolves [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

What Jewlicious said. They aren't even "trying" to pretend they are ethical anymore.