You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
[–]Vvswiftvv170 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
But wait, I'm confused. Doesn't the entire trans bathroom argument revolve around the idea that "bad things happen to me, so I should get to choose my bathroom based on my own identity"?
Both sides seem to be relying on "bad things happen to me and I think men are scary" as their primary argumenta, with different definitions of who counts as a man to be scared of.
Personally, I think trannies are mentally ill, and that we should be looking for ways to prevent the illness from occuring in new people, and treat the people who already have it, rather than the arguing about the best ways to accomodate their delusions.
[–]Vvswiftvv170 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
But sometimes bad things do happen. If we know creating an environment can increase the chances of something bad happening, wouldn't we want to control the environment to prevent it as much as possible? If we know curtains are easily combustible we don't place a space heater under them because the chance of a fire would increase. Your argument to that is, "well it might not catch on fire, so it's ok to put the heater there"? No, you wouldn't say that because its common sense. So why when the risk is to women/children and the danger a voyerism man suddenly its "different"? It's not. Should we also stop improving safety standards in cars because there is a chance something bad may not happen? Here is a compiled quick and dirty list of all the restroom voyerism that has been going on since this debate started. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/04/23/twenty-stories-proving-targets-pro-transgender-bathroom-policy-danger-women-children/
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Vvswiftvv17 ago (edited ago)
But wait, I'm confused. Doesn't the entire trans bathroom argument revolve around the idea that "bad things happen to me, so I should get to choose my bathroom based on my own identity"?
[–] HorrorAndHatred ago
Both sides seem to be relying on "bad things happen to me and I think men are scary" as their primary argumenta, with different definitions of who counts as a man to be scared of.
Personally, I think trannies are mentally ill, and that we should be looking for ways to prevent the illness from occuring in new people, and treat the people who already have it, rather than the arguing about the best ways to accomodate their delusions.
[–] Vvswiftvv17 ago (edited ago)
But sometimes bad things do happen. If we know creating an environment can increase the chances of something bad happening, wouldn't we want to control the environment to prevent it as much as possible? If we know curtains are easily combustible we don't place a space heater under them because the chance of a fire would increase. Your argument to that is, "well it might not catch on fire, so it's ok to put the heater there"? No, you wouldn't say that because its common sense. So why when the risk is to women/children and the danger a voyerism man suddenly its "different"? It's not. Should we also stop improving safety standards in cars because there is a chance something bad may not happen? Here is a compiled quick and dirty list of all the restroom voyerism that has been going on since this debate started. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/04/23/twenty-stories-proving-targets-pro-transgender-bathroom-policy-danger-women-children/