RESOLVED Archived [PREVIEW WinSql] comment time stamps appear to be incorrect (voatdev)
submitted ago by Opieswife
Posted by: Opieswife
Posting time: 3.3 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 11/1/2017 10:00:00 AM
Views: 82
SCP: 9
9 upvotes, 0 downvotes (100% upvoted it)
RESOLVED Archived [PREVIEW WinSql] comment time stamps appear to be incorrect (voatdev)
submitted ago by Opieswife
Sort: Top
[–] Opieswife [S] 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Please disregard. It appears this was a mistake on my part and not a bug. Thank you @cynicaloldfart and @PeaceSeeker for double checking and replying so quickly.
@PuttItOut perhaps we should look into time travel as a future enhancement. What do you think?
[–] 10037246? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Personally I'm in favour of the idea, but I doubt Putt will have time to work on it what with every else he has on the table. Perhaps the rest of us could unite to tackle the problem.
[–] Germ22 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Putt would be CREATING time if started working on that feature.
BUT, he might also break the universe, not sure if that is worth it.
[–] guinness2 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I proposed this at a management meeting as a way to manage 11th hour user requirement changes without adjusting the delivery deadline, but unfortunately, time and budget constrains prohibited us from researching time travel too...
[–] cynicaloldfart 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Yes, I remember this. Peace's comment was there BEFORE I posted my comment, and Peace's comment was not a reply to @digitalentity1497 as shown. It was a reply to the initial post. It was the first, and only, comment showing when I made my comment. It does seem the order is wrong while the times are correct.
[–] 10037008? 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
I replied to you in the original thread; I blame day mode for being confusing, but unless I am missing something the third comment you're referring to (my comment) was a root comment, not a comment in response to /u/digitalentity1497 -- thus it is possible for my comment to have been made before digitalentity's comment because my comment was not in response to that comment.
[–] cynicaloldfart 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I agree. Think you've got it right.