I'm not 100% about this, but the concept could spur better ideas so here it goes:
Let's say there are accounts that are on here all the time that are attempting to consensus crack voat as an arm of an intelligence agency or anti free speech operative.
Our main measure to counteract this is minimizing their active accounts through the ccp system.
This works for a lot of casual attacks. It would be next to impossible for a bunch of reddit tyrants to come over and turn this place into reddit without the established community's overwhelming consent (freaking impossible.)
However disinfo psyops etc are definitely accomplishable and easy.
WHAT I SUGGEST:
If I find an account that I recognize personally as a shill account and I have no regard for their opinions etc there is an approach other than blocking that I would like to be able to take. I would like to not have their up or down votes calculated into my presentation of Voat when I'm logged in. I may wish to still see their post and comments and interact with them, but my opinion on what they say is contributing and what I think is contributing is so different that I would like to not have their influence over what post and comments I see. This would allow us all as individuals to neutralize the impact of shill activity from the Ed Krassenstein's of Voat. It would be like giving the power of Jack Dorsey to the people. You could enable a master switch to turn this list on or off when viewing your Voat when logged in.
Consider what I have suggested carefully. The impact long term could be amazing or terrible depending on exactly how it is implemented. So discuss the potential of such a new tool and how this power could be regulated when sent out into the wild.