You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
I do rubiks cubes, and the larger variations. I do up to 5X5X5 for fun. I have a slight issue with parity error (basically you flipped a few blocks). The larger one is solved as such, solve the centers , solve the middle sides, then solve like a 3X3X3.
There are basically two types, even and odd. even cubes (4X4X4 for example) have moving centers, odd, do not. The cube he solved looks like an 11X11X11, which is odd, which is just tedious to solve. Not hard, especially since he uses basic techniques to solve the cube.
Sort: Top
[–] PeeOnYou 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Wow.. that was amazingly boring, even when skipping a few minutes.
[–] Zinq 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Amazing? No.
[–] thewhitewizzard ago
I do rubiks cubes, and the larger variations. I do up to 5X5X5 for fun. I have a slight issue with parity error (basically you flipped a few blocks). The larger one is solved as such, solve the centers , solve the middle sides, then solve like a 3X3X3.
There are basically two types, even and odd. even cubes (4X4X4 for example) have moving centers, odd, do not. The cube he solved looks like an 11X11X11, which is odd, which is just tedious to solve. Not hard, especially since he uses basic techniques to solve the cube.
The second trick I believe was a setup
[–] arrjayjee ago
LOL @ that second trick. It's so blatant.