7
80

[–] thephantompoop 7 points 80 points (+87|-7) ago  (edited ago)

You know, way back when women had no rights and were basically owned by their husbands or fathers, there was absolutely a need for chivalry and being as polite as possible to women. It was the least men could do for them to make up for having no rights.

Now that things have changed, we inherently see much less of a need to be chivalrous. Sure, basic politeness should be shown to everyone. But they want to be equal.

And if they choose to assault someone bigger than them... they will be God damned equal.

0
36

[–] zquad 0 points 36 points (+36|-0) ago  (edited ago)

It was the least men could do for them to make up for having no rights.

No rights? You had to be a rich land owner to have rights, most men also had no rights. Men was given rights for giving their lives for their communities - and only when men realized they got a bad deal offering their lives for little returns. Know how women got rights? They nagged.

Men carried them - women had 0 responsibilities for anything they did. She ran run up debt that her husband had to pay - even after she abandoned the household. She incurred taxes, he was responsible. She couldn't keep up with the Jones' and was dissatisfied, he was sent to the whipping post. Life expectancy has always been lower far lower for men than women: a bear outside - he took care of it, -10 degree weather he went outside to cut the logs, ship sinking - sorry you were born male. Meanwhile she is given the impossible task for watching toddlers, preparing dinner, all while treated like the first creature ever to give birth.

0
21

[–] Petrol_Sexual 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago 

I always loved the argument that women had to stay at home like prisoners. It's like people completely forget that same rule also meant the men had to go and work like slaves. As if every man wanted to go and work instead of being a stay at home dad.

What's completely fucked is that women staying at home started out of respect and caring for women. They are the only ones that can give birth and breast feed, so they were protected while the men went out and risked their lives to bring home food for the women and the children.

Chivalry didn't come from men giving back to women because they didn't have any rights, chivalry came from treating women like they were better because women were seen as being worth more.

And before anyone, in the western world, tries to say that women are at the mercy of men because of men are stronger, take a look at statistics for percentage of domestic violence. In my city the police report 46/54 % women/men being the perpetrator. Unfortunately that's only what's reported, any reasonable person should conclude that given the societal pressures, most men that come home to a violent wife aren't reporting it.

0
8

[–] 6double5321 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

But we're woman beaters if we say that. Leg sweeps work wonders.

0
9

[–] Kleyno 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

You're not a beater if you just use your greater muscle mass to push her backwards so that she loses her footing and lands in the dirt.

Gotta be smart during retaliation. A shove is a defensive gesture. Much harder to make that seem like assault in a court of law. Though they of course will try, because some women only want to be equal when it suits them.

Also helps to have video and audio proof of the entire altercation. Though as we are seeing, it does not stop the morons from being morons.

0
3

[–] Grospoliner 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I prefer crouching fierce punch.

0
1

[–] Broc_Lia 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

You know, way back when women had no rights and were basically owned by their husbands or fathers, there was absolutely a need for chivalry and being as polite as possible to women. It was the least men could do for them to make up for having no rights.

This is the feminist party line, yes. The reality is that you're talking about a time when few people had any rights and chivalry was an integral part of the culture which supposedly denied women rights. There wasn't much in the way of equality, but that doesn't mean men had it any better.

1
39

[–] Hugh_G 1 points 39 points (+40|-1) ago 

95% of the comments I saw said the dumb bitch hit him first

2
16

[–] 1rash 2 points 16 points (+18|-2) ago 

Yes. Most comments are defending the man and getting the most likes.

No need for a sensational headline.

1
10

[–] NinjaPoolboy 1 points 10 points (+11|-1) ago 

Look at the dates, they are all new comments on a video months old. I'm guessing your seeing all the new voat comments.

0
0

[–] Zidota 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

That's because she DID hit him first, at least in what we saw. It's pretty clear something was already going down, since the police were already there. However, she hit him, he hit her back, cops reacted to only arrest him.

They should have both been arrested and his offense should have been minor, compared to hers, as he was defending himself.

1
17

[–] Bluellama 1 points 17 points (+18|-1) ago 

PUSSY PASS ACTIVATED.

0
11

[–] Warden 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago  (edited ago)

GET

FUCKING

CLOCKED

0
4

[–] ButcherOfBlaviken 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

GET

FUCKING

BOMBED

4
-4

1
10

[–] monkeypoo 1 points 10 points (+11|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Some dude said "He hit a girl!". Looked like heated drunk people and some entitled stupid white girl pulled out her pussy pass, hit someone and when the person retaliated he was beaten? I could understand both persons being separated and possibly detained. For the guy to just be beaten up because he hit a girl back? That was bullshit and if you agree to this violence you do not agree in equality.

1
15

[–] idonotvoat 1 points 15 points (+16|-1) ago 

white knight beta males

[–] [deleted] 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
4

[–] ThisWeirdIndividual 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

If you think about it.....that's actually misogynistic " lol dude you got hit by a GIRL! A fucking GIRL ahaha ! Shame on you, a man, for being hit by this weak little thing!" hmm wait a minute...that's actually not misogynistic at all.... Because they are indeed weak little things. So confused, thank you feminism...

I guess males shouldn't punch women after all.. Just shoving them to the ground should be enough..wait ...but a weak male getting punched in the face by a larger male after assaulting him...he'd deserve it... So why wouldn't a woman? So confused...fank you feminism

It's like they want to keep both the "women are special and deserve special treatment" and "women are the same as men they deserve to be treated equally"... So confused... Fuck you feminism

2
7

[–] Malek 2 points 7 points (+9|-2) ago 

Equal rights, equal lefts.

0
4

[–] carlip 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Lifted right out of the YouTube comment section. Bravo Ralph.

0
5

[–] dabork 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Bro that comment gets posted every time in one of these videos, it's not some unique phrase it's a pretty common thing people say.

0
3

[–] Malek 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I have been drinking all day watching college football. Didnt even bother to look at the youtube comments. Why did you?

0
0

[–] walkweapon 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

My thoughts exactly. For a second I wondered if Youtube and Voat comments were linked. LOL

0
0

[–] WildThingSammiT 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

God damnit Ralph...

0
3

[–] grade1flute 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

hahaha amongst the commotion, "There's my flip flop"

load more comments ▼ (14 remaining)