0
163

[–] NotAnOctopus 0 points 163 points (+163|-0) ago 

Top comment is pure gold. "Goddamn. Monty Python's later stuff is fucking weird."

[–] [deleted] 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

[–] [deleted] 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
12

[–] SASbird 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

Seriously tho, WTF is this event? A crowd of mostly young people dressed in suits. Some dude in the middle writing everything down. Some chick on a throne looking seriously bored. Weird old looking boxes on a table....just wtf

0
23

[–] Pisodeuorrior 0 points 23 points (+23|-0) ago  (edited ago)

A debate in Oxford.

Edit: you peasant;)

0
2

[–] mansausage 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

It's just normal everyday Brits. They love getting pussy whipped in fancy environments. They call this "culture".

0
2

[–] Kellam 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

0
1

[–] beerok 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

It is a debate at the Oxford Union. During term-time they have debates like this once a week, covering a range of hot-button issues.

0
100

[–] Thatdrumdude 0 points 100 points (+100|-0) ago 

The thing that always gets me is that apparently the only privileged people on the planet are white males. Which would make us the minority, which would then mean we are less privileged solely because we are the majority of a negative statistic.

It's all a vicious style of stupid. But the best part is, is when I'm being told that I'm privileged for being a white male, by a white female in better clothes than I can afford who gets to go to college because she can afford it. I wish society would shit me some privilege because working a paycheck to paycheck job to live in a trailer is doing me fucking great.

1
6

[–] stoic_shitlord 1 points 6 points (+7|-1) ago 

Which would make us the minority, which would then mean we are less privileged solely because we are the majority of a negative statistic.

I'm not sure, are you making the point that a minority is unable to oppress a majority?

0
20

[–] TopShelfPrivilege 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago  (edited ago)

According to the people who tend to spout bullshit about "privilege," that's exactly what they believe. That's why they honestly think black people can't be racist against white people and women can't be sexist.

[–] [deleted] 1 points 10 points (+11|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
4

[–] PushYourself 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Privledge is generally financial wealth.

0
0

[–] Thatdrumdude 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

That's what I've always captured from it. But somehow all white males are still privileged, even us poor white folk who grew up in poor house holds, and are still poor.

0
0

[–] Broc_Lia 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

by a white female in better clothes than I can afford who gets to go to college because she can afford it

I looked her up and she's there on a scholarship, that said, she doesn't exactly sound working class.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 77 points (+77|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
11

[–] poodog 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

Then tumblerina said "no absolutely not let me tell you..."

Just spewing opinions, not backing it up with facts

0
2

[–] Novius 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

No, no. This is much much more than mere wrong opinion, this is Monty Python doing 1984. She wants an approved speech code in order to free speech, not have free speech. She actually thinks "free" as in 'to free' rather than 'Unconstrained'. She uses the word censorship in such a farcical manner yet so clearly calls for a speech board preventing wrong gender pronouns and other horrifically subjective terms and manners.

In layman's terms, she wants to free speech and to have freed speech. As in a speech which is freed from the wrong sorts of people and their use. Nice game drop as well. I love the constant refrain that Christina Hoff Sommers is some sort of bully pecking out the eyes of women who's brilliance would be self-evident if only they could've berated us for hours.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
32

[–] EvilSmurf 0 points 32 points (+32|-0) ago 

She said: "Is it not true that to have a different opinion isn't the same as telling other people that they shouldn't - or they can't - have an opinion."

0
2

[–] vonclausewitz 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Were you able to understand her question?

Yes. At that point in her diatribe, the feminist was claiming that censorship is refusing to use a transgendered person's preferred pronouns. In other words, the opinion, "I think you're male" is censorship.

The asian lady said, "having an opinion is different than telling other people they can't have an opinion."

The feminist had just finished claiming that preventing people from speaking is not censorship. So, it's another example of SJWs redefining words.

0
3

[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Yeah, how passive agressive and smug she "sticked it to the white cishet man" how psyched she was "givning the opportunity" a proud wymyn of color to speak and then got BTFO, how here hugbox world crubbeled and the dismissive waving of her hand.

"You don say what I want to hear stupid chink so STFU"

Fucking gold, just like:

She: you wrote shit

Guy: citation needed

She: TRIGGERT SHITLORD

0
2

[–] Broc_Lia 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

and then got a full day 20 seconds of applause whilst this tumblrina grew visibly impatient

That's not unreasonable, they have limited time to speak and the applause cuts into that time.

0
32

[–] fcsuper 0 points 32 points (+32|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The hypocrisy oozes from her pores as she engages in the very behaviors to which she protests during her protest.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 31 points (+31|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
10

[–] ILikeMyDogNotYours 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

"We're going to promote freedom of speech for everybody, and to do so we're going to have to get these guys to shut up."

You heard it here, men are sub human, because she would have ended that statement at everybody otherwise. Should she consider men to be part of the whole of "everybody". Thus, the fact that she singles and excludes men from the category of "everybody" means simply that men are not human.

0
3

[–] probablysarcastic 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

So.... Reddit then?

0
23

[–] revsta 0 points 23 points (+23|-0) ago 

I love how she won't let the WHITE MAN talk, but the first 'minority' woman who stands she allows.

One of the most delusional people I've seen speak in a long time.

0
16

[–] SlipperyChicken 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago  (edited ago)

She was just enjoying the power trip of being able to tell that guy when he could talk. Classic authoritarian in action. They single out a group of people and they enjoy having power over that group.

0
3

[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

You know what the actual fun thing is in that situation ?

The white evil man comply to her wishes.

Reverse the roles and you'd have a Sanders like bit with " LET ME SPEAK I WONT BE SILENCED"

0
23

[–] turtlelover05 0 points 23 points (+23|-0) ago 

Notice how she gets defensive when questioned about her research. It's fucking pathetic.

0
2

[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Thats how her research and debating works.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3C9rMIRuF8

0
1

[–] mansausage 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Blaze it.

0
2

[–] Lodley 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Well he should remember that thing she claims he wrote but she can't remember exactly what what it was...

[–] [deleted] 0 points 22 points (+22|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
11

[–] treyman780 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

0
4

[–] feistylemur 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

This was my favorite reaction.

Reaction

1
1

[–] GuenMakunikoru 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

Is that Stahp-girl behind him?

0
1

[–] plexo 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Man, that guy on the right has murder on his face.

0
0

[–] MrBeast 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

That guy in the center background on the second picture is wondering how the fuck he ended up there.

0
20

[–] STARVE_THE_BEAST 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago  (edited ago)

What she lacks in intelligence she more than makes up for in phony self-righteousness.

0
2

[–] flimflamedthezimzam 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I thought there was a conservation law that covers the relation of the two?

load more comments ▼ (53 remaining)