[–] Smallest_Skil 1 points 30 points (+31|-1) ago 

I saw that, all I could think of is the jews are going to screw tucker.

[–] green_man 0 points 25 points (+25|-0) ago 

He's probably going to be replaced by that little rat jew Ben Shapiro.

[–] WilliamCutting 1 points 15 points (+16|-1) ago 

Can't wait to see boomer spam about;


[–] Smallest_Skil 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

tucker and haniety (ingram sometimes) are the only reason I watch fox

[–] beesmeesmonies 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

"They (the Jews) work more effectively against us, than the enemy's armies. They are a hundred times more dangerous to our liberties and the great cause we are engaged in. It is much to be lamented that each state, long ago, has not hunted them down as pest to society and the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America." - George Washington Jew Talmud excerpts (the book that calls Christ's mother a whore & a bastard of a roman soldier): Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death." Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age." Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording." Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death." Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Show no mercy to the Goyim." Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth." Choschen Hamm 266,1: "A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people." Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them." Baba Necia 114, 6: "The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts." Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves." Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night." Aboda Sarah 37a: "A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated." Gad. Shas. 2:2: "A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl." Tosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: "If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible." Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces." Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples." Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy." Seph. Jp., 92, 1: "God has given the Jews power over the possessions and blood of all nations." Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 156: "When a Jew has a Gentile in his clutches, another Jew may go to the same Gentile, lend him money and in turn deceive him, so that the Gentile shall be ruined. For the property of a Gentile, according to our law, belongs to no one, and the first Jew that passes has full right to seize it." Schulchan Aruch, Johre Deah, 122: "A Jew is forbidden to drink from a glass of wine which a Gentile has touched, because the touch has made the wine unclean." Nedarim 23b: "He who desires that none of his vows made during the year be valid, let him stand at the beginning of the year and declare, 'Every vow which I may make in the future shall be null'. His vows are then invalid." JEWS WILL TRY TO DENY THESE on their JEW website http://www.minuteswithmessiah.... * Sanhedrin 59a: "Murdering Goyim is like killing a wild animal." * Abodah Zara 26b: "Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed." THE JEW WILL USE 'SUBTERFUGE WORDING' but has no out on any of the above. Jews claim anti-semitism when they are proven racists themselves from their own book of cultural laws the talmud shown in part above. Try "jew guilt" us? There's plenty in that link to their talmud cultural laws and their history to be guilty of. Really nice people (not)!!!

[–] MrShekelstein 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

The jews already said they were going to kill him on family guy.

[–] IndigoElectric 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I must have missed this, do you have a link?

[–] drj2 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

He's been doing this kinda of shit forever.

[–] Scald85 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

The elephant in the room is real estate. Residential real estate construction only requires about 1% of the work force, but people spend half their income on housing. Financial speculation drives up the cost of goods over a magnitude more than their labor cost of production. Simply defining usury as charging excessive interest only scratches the surface of how bankers control the economy and markets are illusions.

Bankers deny mortgages to populations they want to segregate from the right neighborhoods. They give overpriced mortgages to populations they want to control, and even make them think they're becoming rich as their numbers dwindle. They coordinate with government housing to strategically reduce housing values in one area, while bidding up the values in other areas. It's demographic engineering.

[–] Chad88 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Land itself is finite, of course you're not paying only (or even primarily) for the construction costs. It could be cheaper for sure though.

[–] jimibulgin 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

For real. I bought my house for $100K. Insurance company says it will cost $150k to rebuild, using Federally approved, industry standard software. If the house burns down, I still own the lot, which is worth $50k easily. So at most, I want it insured for $50K, but nope, not allowed under standard policy. A non-standard policy for only $50K would cost just as much..... Fuck these people.

[–] squiremarcus 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

This isn't true. Building a house is often more expensive then buying a used one.

[–] Apexbreed 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Because they fuck you on the costs all around. You could build a house yourself (if you knew how, of course) for a tenth of what they charge. But mostly the conversation is about land, not the actual building. The land is where OPs comment really comes into play.

[–] railripper2 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

I pay my cards off every month. I get points that turn into cash so I do ok. The secret is as always, never spend more that you take in. You have to have more restraint with credit just because it seems you can spend without consequences. But then, restraint is not a quality most people have these days. So, I guess they blame the banks.

[–] Awful-Falafel 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

I started with a debit card, so my mindset is the same about credit cards. No more money = no more spending. Simple as that.

[–] prairie 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Agreed. I didn't have a credit card at all until recently. I've paid it off immediately every time, no finance charges (hell, I've earned over $100 in cash-back rewards since I got it). I got a shitty APR (something like 18%) but I never plan on accruing any interest.

I had someone put hundreds in fraud on my debit (never even lost the card) which prompted me to get a CC (I got the debit charges reversed but it was too much of a scare). Much better CC protection, especially when buying online. The cash back is just icing on the cake.

[–] railripper2 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Very, very smart!

[–] lipids 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Credit cards collect fees from merchants. You think you're getting money back. Everything is more expensive to account for credit cards.

[–] railripper2 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

What you're saying is true. However, merchants (except gas stations) charge everyone the same price for a product. So, you my as well take advantage of any credit you can get. I know this isn't right. If anything, that should not be allowed.

[–] [deleted] 2 points 1 points (+3|-2) ago 


[–] drj2 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

How are you taking 25% if I pay it off in full every month?

[–] ScreaminMime 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

The 1-2% isn't what they're giving back to you, it's a portion of the amount they are charging the business to use their card which the business has to pay by raising prices. All you who don't even use credit cards are getting fucked by them by paying everyone else's rewards.

[–] SparklingWiggle 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

you can spend without consequences.

...but there are consequences. (I realize you know this but oversimplified the statement.)

[–] railripper2 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

True, spend wisely. Thanks for the thought.

[–] Goathole 8 points 6 points (+14|-8) ago 

Waaaiiit a minute. Hold up now.

Nobody forces people to use credit cards OR take bank loans beyond their limit to pay them. NO ONE. YOU DO THAT. You should be responsible enough to know what your finances are. Do we not demand freedom from government and corporations making choices for us?

Well with that comes RESPONSIBILITY. You can't have it both ways.

[–] gazillions 0 points 25 points (+25|-0) ago  (edited ago)

That's not how it's worked out though.

It's a form of social credit and surveillance as much as financial credit.

Try to rent a hotel room, get on a plane or rent an apartment without one.

The entire credit rating system it ties into should be illegal.

The province of Quebec in Canada held out the longest and had laws saying you could not refuse anyone service for anything if they didn't have a credit card. I think that law just quietly passed away when no one was looking.

On top of that, merchants that accept credit cards add a two percent surcharge to everything they sell to cover the merchant's fees the credit cards charge. Mosts places have laws against only charging the credit card user for the fees.

It isn't about free market capitalism and choices. It's extortion.

[–] Rubberdong 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

plus...when loans drive prices up.

Imagine ten middle class men trying to buy cars.

now imagine ten middle class men...plus a bunch of poor idiots willing to buy these cars in credit.

drive car prices up.

[–] BlackSheepBrouhaha 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

You can get a secured credit card if you're retarded about finances, or a Visa gift card.

[–] HappyMealBullshit 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Just because people are responsible for their choices, doesn't mean predatory lending isn't a harm to society and shouldn't be banned. You can have it both ways. People can be forced to take responsibility for their actions, and so can the banks. With that comes the banks taking responsibility for giving out loans they shouldn't.

[–] Goathole 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago 

doesn't mean predatory lending isn't a harm to society and shouldn't be banned.

I disagree wholeheatedly. "Predatory lending" is a dog whistle. The fact is that business A offers a service and Person B accepts it at the cost agreed upon.

With that comes the banks taking responsibility for giving out loans they shouldn't.

I don't disagree with this which I believed I was clear in my original post. If the bank knows that the person can't pay then it shouldn't give the loan. They are gambling and when you gamble you can sometimes lose. OUR government REQUIRES that they gamble and pays them(with our money) when they default. That should stop.

[–] MrShekelstein 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

There's a reason we ban loads of jewish scams.

They offer no benefit and can only hurt society im afraid.

[–] PHXSunlight 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

But we don't ban enough Jew scams though.

[–] Aprioned 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I agree with you maybe 90%, people need to learn responsibility, but the entire system is also set up where you have to take on some kind of financial liability to build up this thing called a "credit history" so that any time you try to apply for anything like rent, you don't get denied. Get rid of this bullshit "credit score" system and you will see a lot of things improve, I'm torn however, because this system also keeps most niggers (I use this term for social delinquents in general as well, not just blacks) at bay as they tend to have low credit scores which limits where they can propagate, even makes it easy to identify them on the road, a lot of them drive Nissans because those dealerships give out high APR loans like candy to people with shit credit.

[–] Damnpasswords 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I always wondered why so many shit people drove nissans

[–] TheBuddha 2 points 5 points (+7|-2) ago 

I blame poor self control.

Don't use a credit card in excess of what you can pay off that billing period. Simply don't carry a balance. Tada! No interest!

[–] philmchawk 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

You're ignoring the whole point. Usury is bad because it artificially drive up prices. College is the best example. The reason it's so overpriced is because of loans/grants, the actual value/cost(as in the money required to run the place) hasn't changed. Your TV, computer, car, house, college, pretty much anything over 500 dollars is about double the price it should be because of usury.

[–] TheBuddha 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

Retail value hasn't been tied to resource consumption in decades. Try to claim it is usury that's responsible for this is a very, very simple outlook. It's much more complicated than to point and say, "That's why!"

That's like saying WWII ended 'cause we dropped nukes. No, it's much more complicated than that.

[–] Chad88 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Tucker did not actually make this point in the video.

[–] Turnagain 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I see that most still can't see how the Federal Reserve is fucking them like a tired sheep. The Treasury prints the money. Then it's given to the Fed. Then the Fed "monetizes" the money by "selling" it for IOUs (bonds) that must be paid back WITH INTEREST. Ask yourself, "Why doesn't the Treasury print the money and issue it itself"? That's what Kennedy was trying to do with EO 11110. In a sane world, the amount of money that can be printed is limited by the amount of gold on hand to redeem the paper IOUs or dollar bills.

After the kikes won WW II, they flooded Europe with billions of paper dollars to rebuild from war damage. Those were known as "Euro-dollars". After the Europeans (and others) got their shit together again, they had a surplus of paper Euro-dollars. Not being stupid, they presented those paper dollars to the US for redemption in gold. Of course the US, read Federal Reserve, had nowhere near enough gold to redeem all of those dollars. Nixon had the choice of taking the dollar off the gold standard or declaring the US bankrupt. Essentially, there had been a run on the bank and the bank failed.

Since then, the Fed has had a free hand to fuck over the dollar as much as they wish. That's why you're paying $3.00 -$4.00 a gallon for gasoline when that same gasoline cost about $0.25 per gallon in 1960. That's why a loaf of bread that used to cost $0.20 now costs $5.00. It's not a question of whether or not you use a credit card. You're getting fucked whether you do or not.

[–] Zoldam 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I thought the treasury issued the bonds and the fed printed it. Either way it's a bullshit system.

[–] Gingercuntfirecrotch 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

the most important cartoon ever made does a really good job highlighting the real problem.

[–] Broc_Lia 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I'm pretty sure the problem here is that these companies know the government will bail them out if they ever get too far into hock with people who can't pay back. Without that kind of safety net there's simply no reason to lend ridiculous sums to irresponsible idiots.

load more comments ▼ (22 remaining)