You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →


[–] Conspirologist 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Good for him. At least there will be one celebrity on Gab.

[–] [deleted] 1 points 9 points (+10|-1) ago  (edited ago)



[–] XSS1337 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Agreed. Jews use the 75 / 25 rule.

75 percent truth used to slide the other 25 of lies.

Gab is owned

Periscope is a hive

Minds is owned by (((people)))

Bitchute I am still out on but given time it will go the way of Y0utub3.


[–] mattsixteen24 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

I've only seen gab remove users for doxing and threatening other users with violence.


[–] Blacksdonttip 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

As long as it's content neutral certain censorship is necessary evil. You wouldn't want kids watching porn or people posting child porn. Generally, less censorship is better and I support zero censorship, but realistically some (minimal) degree is necessary. The major issue with Twitter Facebook, reddit, etc is that they censor based on viewpoint, despite pretending they don't, which is clearly demonstrated by all the white hate and the immediate banning of anyone even discussing other races Ina a negative light. Hopefully the new sites apply the TOS neutrally, which is still kind of subjective, but realistically we need lawmakers and/or the FCC to regulate social media as public spaces and/or common carriers (though this is a bit more complex an issue). If the TOS says no political speech then they can ban people, but no selective enforcement. Realistically, Twitter isn't going anywhere anytime soon and this is the exact type of situation where government regulation is the only way to reign in out of control corporations.


[–] InternetUser 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Not as famous as Jones, but Sam Hyde is on Gab. His user name is @hillaryclinton