You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] mangdesign 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

What's their end game? Are they trying to say that it's acceptable when they do it? Is it supposed to be 'retaliation' for their perceived wrongs? Like @Hayashimo says, trying to alter history is some 1984, Fahrenheit 451 level shit. They're blinded by them thinking they are on the "right side of history". Ridiculous.

[–] SexMachine 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

I think it an attempt to show that black and white people are interchangeable, as in if Europe had been occupied by niggers instead of white people, then they would be on par with us?

I really have no fucking clue. This is really mind boggling.

Now, there were Moors, who after serving in the Roman legions, were allowed Roman citizenship, but I don't really know how widespread those citizens moved about the empire. The Romans built them cities in North Africa with running water and working sewers.

So, while it's possible for black Roman citizens to have traveled to the British Isles, I think it's a huge unknown as to whether or not they actually did.

I think I've figured out the agenda here. It's part of the push for "Europe has always been a multicultural society, and belongs to all people.....(except white people)"
While, yes, there might've be a few niggers or Turks here and there, 99% of Europeans would have gone their entire lives without seeing a dark skinned person.

[–] analfaveto 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

I'm a European who was born in the 20th century, and I saw my first black person when I was 8 years old. I was dumbfounded.