You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
0

[–] LazarusLong 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

How could it be a "classic sign?"

Females in law enforcement are relatively new.

Shit, so is the concept of a police officer as we understand it today.

0
2

[–] White-Supremacist 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

How could it be a "classic sign?"

Feminism, female rights and freedom of any variety, but female cops aren't just a joke, it's like the epitome of feminism, harbinger of doom.

2
-2

[–] LazarusLong 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

If anything, female freedom has been correlated with the most successful and powerful societies in recent history.

Individual and economic freedom in general are the hallmarks of success in the modern world.

Historically, the amount of freedom specifically allotted to females in a given society, relative to contemporaries, doesn't seem to correlate at all to the success of that society.

Almost as if its one factor among millions that determine the course of history.

But that's aside from the point, feminism, female rights/legally equality, and female cops can't be a "classic sign" of anything. They're all relatively recent concepts.

1
-1

[–] wufong 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

"Females in law enforcement are relatively new"

Not outside of shithole muslim countries. And no you faggot. They haven't been around as long as male cops. But they have been around long enough, for there to be "classic" behaviour problems

0
0

[–] LazarusLong 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Yeah, they're still relatively new anywhere, and I never said they've been around as long as male cops.

They're not classic, they aren't a historical sign of anything.