You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
Not trying to be offensive, but I think you're thinking about it too shallowly.
He doesn't mean "negotiate" as in sitting down, debating on terms and conditions, writing out the guidelines, and having everything documented and notarized. Negotiations can be physical, verbal, or abstract. If you're my boss, and I work for you, and I do a good job, I will "negotiate" for respect through an agreed-to "trade" of my hard work and your good management... or, in other words, I've earned it through that "trade." All "earnings" are a series of trades, which happen through some form of mutual negotiation.
As for the "fake respect," that was his point... he even said that, explicitly. He acknowledges that, through force, you can make him "respect" you, but (most likely) not the same way as if he had mutually agreed to respect you.
And your third point contradicts your second point, completely.
I disagree, there is only one true love likewise only one true genuine respect, all others forms are pale shadows meant to deceive the receiver of such
Who even cares about being so detailed about all of this social crap.. (answer: SJWs).. If I were that professor I would blow my brains out having to deal with things as trivial as how much respect some one deserves or how to not offend some one..
All this time in these social classes could be used for some thing greater like talking about how to advance science of become inter-planetary or some thing.. If some one is disrespecting you, YOU WILL KNOW IT; You don't have to try to figure it out like a detective looking for clues..
[–]prairie0 points
1 point
1 point
(+1|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
You can't have respect when you're forced to submit. All you can do is put on a (submissive) act of respect. And if you're submitting, you can't ever have a negotiation with the other person as a peer so you both get what you each want. This is one reason I find all anti-discrimination laws disgusting (the ones that dictate what one can do with their own property).
Sort: Top
[–] 8845372? 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
Pay 50k a year to listen to some mentally ill student prattle on about pronouns. Wonder why you have no marketable skills...
[–] 8846381? 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
And then listen to a professor in a university describe something that every elementary school student should've learned.
[–] 8844701? 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
There's three ways to receive respect: earn/negotiate, enslave and force, or become a tyrant (where we currently are)
[–] Apeabel 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago (edited ago)
I disagree slightly. You can't negotiate for respect. You only earn it.
Enslaving and forcing 'respect' will only get you resentment and fake respect.
And you sure can force respect if you're a tyrant but in the Antifa case it's more trying to be respected by tyranny (and failing at that).
[–] theMETA 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
Not trying to be offensive, but I think you're thinking about it too shallowly.
He doesn't mean "negotiate" as in sitting down, debating on terms and conditions, writing out the guidelines, and having everything documented and notarized. Negotiations can be physical, verbal, or abstract. If you're my boss, and I work for you, and I do a good job, I will "negotiate" for respect through an agreed-to "trade" of my hard work and your good management... or, in other words, I've earned it through that "trade." All "earnings" are a series of trades, which happen through some form of mutual negotiation.
As for the "fake respect," that was his point... he even said that, explicitly. He acknowledges that, through force, you can make him "respect" you, but (most likely) not the same way as if he had mutually agreed to respect you.
And your third point contradicts your second point, completely.
[–] 8846234? ago (edited ago)
What I've learnt as salesman is that respect isn't earned, it's owed
Knock on some1's door, tell him "yo mothafuck, buy my shit nigger bitch!" and see how it turns out
Respect must be earned is warzone logic
You don't go in a restaurant and piss on everyone because they didn't earn your respect already
You don't do that
So...
It's not about being earned
But it can definitely be denied
[–] JustFeelsGoodMan 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I disagree, there is only one true love likewise only one true genuine respect, all others forms are pale shadows meant to deceive the receiver of such
[–] 8845310? 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
good but that first minute of the retard talking is annoying
[–] notyouraveragellama ago
Yeah, I couldn't watch because that fuckhead's voice was too annoying.
[–] Wuttier ago
Remember; only during RIOTS can you beat the stupid out of him.
[–] Baconmon 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Who even cares about being so detailed about all of this social crap.. (answer: SJWs).. If I were that professor I would blow my brains out having to deal with things as trivial as how much respect some one deserves or how to not offend some one..
All this time in these social classes could be used for some thing greater like talking about how to advance science of become inter-planetary or some thing.. If some one is disrespecting you, YOU WILL KNOW IT; You don't have to try to figure it out like a detective looking for clues..
[–] 8845298? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
[–] Bill_Murrays_Sandals 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
And that's that!
[–] KingTrump2024 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Meh, professors are in a circle jerk ivory tower.
[–] prairie 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
You can't have respect when you're forced to submit. All you can do is put on a (submissive) act of respect. And if you're submitting, you can't ever have a negotiation with the other person as a peer so you both get what you each want. This is one reason I find all anti-discrimination laws disgusting (the ones that dictate what one can do with their own property).