1
37

[–] Troll 1 points 37 points (+38|-1) ago 

If I recall correctly this is actually from before the SJW fuckheads became a thing. Norman Finkelstein is an anti-zionist and has quite a few words about Israel's politics.

0
0

[–] JTMTL 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Dr. Norman Finkelstein is the bravest academic on Earth. He has lost his job & risked his life to represent the side of brutalized Palestinians by Israel. He continues to speak all over the World because he knows it is the right thing to do.

9
0

[–] Porom 9 points 0 points (+9|-9) ago 

SJWs have been around since the beginning of time. Some of them have done okay things, like advocating slaves rights, although some have done atrocious things, such as browbeating people into feeling guilty for imagined sleights. The latter has become more popular in the past 4 years, but both have always been and still are today.

0
5

[–] Subtenko 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

People who want justice are just decent human beings. Someone that has the SJW title....most likely they are crazy like the ones you see in videos

0
4

[–] Broda 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I dont think advocates for human rights should be called sjws. SJWs are the bottom feeders of that group at best. I don't think they even give a shit, if you want me to be honest. Maybe this cunt thinks getting up to the mic and crying about jews that died 70 years ago makes her a better person. I wouldn't be surprised if most of who we label SJWs had a tumor on the part of the brain that worked out reasoning and logic. Hell they all seem pretty fucking retarded and that's cool with me if they would just shut the fuck up and to spew that garbage out any chance they get.

0
1

[–] rwbj 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Calling abolitionists SJWs is tremendously insulting to the former. People who support or even fight for social justice are not social justice warriors - they're simply good human beings. Social justice warriors are a mockery of this good and in today's society are increasingly often the people those who actually support social justice ought oppose. For instance people stating things like "Kill all white people." are invariably social justice warriors. Just because you're acting like a bigoted and ignorant asshole against a majority group doesn't suddenly mean you get label yourself a just crusader - no you're still just a bigoted and ignorant asshole.

Abolitionists struggled to have a group of humans considered as humans, and not property. Social justice warriors falsified a story about renowned scientist Tim Hunt and then rabidly spread it about to try to hurt him, and did ultimately force him to resign (before it was revealed to have been completely fraudulent), for no apparent reason other than the color of his skin. No, these are not the same sort of people - not at all.

1
0

[–] sactostar 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

yes. I think you are correct.

1
21

[–] I_like_paint [S] 1 points 21 points (+22|-1) ago 

Skip to 2:50 fir the face of a slayed sjw

2
9

[–] Sinful_Casshern 2 points 9 points (+11|-2) ago 

Fucking gold, can anyone make this a dank gif. I'm too retarded to do it honestly. If not I'll happily replay it on jewtube.

2
3

[–] I_like_paint [S] 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago 

There must be someone on voat who is a pro in dank gifs.

0
0

[–] Gardmeria 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Hot. Bet she cries when she gets banged too

0
18

[–] VivaFrei 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago  (edited ago)

This video is interesting, because it illustrates why you cannot argue from either emotions or experience.

When you argue from emotions, you become irrational and intransigent... "how dare you not respect of my emotions and feelings?"

When you argue from experience, two different people can have the exact same experience, yet come to diametrically opposed to conclusions from that same experience. One person gets into a car accident, and decides never to drive again. Another person gets into the same car accident, and besides that it will not deter them from driving in the future.

His parents were Holocaust survivors, and he comes to the conclusion that Israeli conduct is indefensible. Another person who has parents that were Holocaust survivors might come to the conclusion that their experience is exactly why they need a Jewish state to exist.

Arguments should be based on logic, history, facts, and realistic solutions. Not tears and individual experience that is, by its nature, is totally individual.

[edit] typos

0
4

[–] I_like_paint [S] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Hear ye!

0
2

[–] Rakosman 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Unfortunately - according to a couple studies I've come across, and that I am far too lazy to find - most people, when presented with tangible evidence, facts, and scientific data, will just close their mind and double down on their opinion - effectively winning the argument if only in that the other person, at that point, cannot sway their beliefs.

Intelligent people tend toward the opposite; they reject anecdote and emotion and demand facts to support claims and strive to keep an open mind even if it means reassessing their viewpoint.

0
6

[–] uniques 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

I have heard it said "you can not reason some one out of a position they did not reason them selves in to in the first place"

0
0

[–] JTMTL 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Before you think you've brilliantly summarized the situation. Dr. Norman Finkelstein was very pro-Israel and very much a young Jewish man shocked by the horrors of Nazis Germany. Then as an academic, he started finding huge inconsistencies and flat out lies in books written about Israel & Palestine. Since he is a man with huge integrity, he champions the truth. He champions the facts. He is a rare and brave man who has lost his job and been barred from traveling to Palestine by Israel.

0
0

[–] Scablifter 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

How can you speak about a highly emotive issue without becoming emotional? Those who say that cold logic, facts and history are the only way to argue are either emotionless anyway or are very frightened of their emotions.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
19

[–] InyourfaceNancyGrace 0 points 19 points (+19|-0) ago 

Who the fuck in that audience has actually suffered under Nazi rule? Jesus Christ that was over 70 years ago, there are very few people alive who actually lived through WWII, let alone those who were persecuted by the Nazis. And none of them are this 20-something bitch. What the fuck is she even on about?

[–] [deleted] 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
10

[–] 5079726? 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

It's a manipulation technique. A normal biological response is to comfort someone who is suffering. Manipulators take advantage of this along with the general expectation that grown ups don't cry for no reason. The whole safe space movement is based on these techniques.

1
10

[–] Seriousarnoud 1 points 10 points (+11|-1) ago 

Still relevant. Watch the whole clip please

1
9

[–] BentAxel 1 points 9 points (+10|-1) ago 

Don't agree with his content, but I like his style.

1
28

[–] PIcasso54 1 points 28 points (+29|-1) ago 

Even if you do not agree with his points (I certainly don't), you can see how the only type of argument SJW's use are emotional ones blown out of proportion. They are not even trying to form complete and logical arguments, just using shit like "your words were hurtful" to try and shut the speaker up for good. Fuck colleges. Fuck America's education system. The only thing that wasn't completely rage inducing was that the majority of the crowd cheered on the professor.

0
15

[–] SuperConductiveRabbi 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Beyond that, that SJW twit has absolutely no understanding of what suffering is, yet has the audacity to get in front of a microphone and cry fake tears as if she herself was a victim.

5
4

[–] I_like_paint [S] 5 points 4 points (+9|-5) ago 

I was hesitant at first because i didn't agree with his Palestine-Israel bullshit but on the other hand he destroyed her so bad that I had to post.

0
4

[–] PM_ME_UR_NOODZ 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

The attitude and method for manipulating with tears and feigned emotional injury is about the only thing to indicate sjw. Otherwise, white Americans playing the "german-decent" card to manipulate an anti-Zionist jew into censoring himself isn't exactly trademark sjw ideology.

I'd say she just spent too much time hanging around actual sjw's and their ridiculous tactics and she wanted to give it try

0
2

[–] jeegte12 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

wow, i'm so surprised! the title is editorialized clickbait! who coulda guessed.

this is a video of a man talking about his family being victims of the holocaust. it also shows a crying SJW. so yes, the video is worth watching, if only to see a crying SJW, but the SJW was crying before the guy even answered her question. nobody was destroyed in this video.

1
5

[–] 8Hz_WAN_IP 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

Well she was crying because of what the guy said previously.

0
1

[–] Subtenko 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

guys........I think we solved the drought problem.

"nazis......" holds out bucket

load more comments ▼ (13 remaining)