Posted by: [deleted]
Posting time: 2.2 years ago on 9/25/2018 7:16:55 PM
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 12/25/2018 10:00:00 AM
Views: 33
SCP: 4
4 upvotes, 0 downvotes (100% upvoted it)
~1 user(s) here now
Who we are:
For all discussion and links related to politics in the United States of America.
Simple Rules:
Heated debates are encouraged as some of the best ideas are born from intense and healthy argument but please keep it polite and refrain from personal attacks.
What's the difference?
NSFW: No Authorized: No Anon: No Private: No Type: Default
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
Content or User violates User Agreement
Hi, it looks like you're new. Welcome to Voat!
Voat is a censorship-free community platform where content is submitted, organized, moderated and voted on (ranked) by the users.
Archived Account Deleted By User (thegatewaypundit.com)
submitted 2.2 years ago by [deleted]
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Thumperrose 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) 2.2 years ago
why should we call them. the DNC accusers have not filed any legal claims to support them legally.
[–] Lookingglass8 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) 2.2 years ago
True point. Nor do I think they will honestly.
correct but in LEGAL proceedings unless and until they have a LEGAL claim filed they have no LEGAL objections to oppose Judge K appointment
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Thumperrose 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
why should we call them. the DNC accusers have not filed any legal claims to support them legally.
[–] Lookingglass8 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
True point. Nor do I think they will honestly.
[–] Thumperrose 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
correct but in LEGAL proceedings unless and until they have a LEGAL claim filed they have no LEGAL objections to oppose Judge K appointment